Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Who here, truly believes that the Pope and Catholic Church was opposed to the Bible being Translated?

Who here, believes that the Catholic Church was Opposed to the Bible being translated into the Vernacular tongue of various regions?

And Why is this? (e.g., heard it from someone else, &c.,)

Update:

@ Saul follower of Jesus., if I remember correctly, William Tyndale was executed by King Henry VIII.

<<In 1535, Tyndale was arrested by church authorities and jailed in the castle of Vilvoorde outside Brussels for over a year. He was tried for heresy, strangled and burnt at the stake in 1536.>>

I see you copied that directly from Wikipedia, why did you leave out:

"In 1530, he wrote The Practyse of Prelates, opposing Henry VIII's divorce on the grounds that it was unscriptural and was a plot by Cardinal Wolsey to get Henry entangled in the papal courts. The king's wrath was aimed at Tyndale: Henry asked the emperor Charles V to have the writer apprehended and returned to England. Tyndale made his case in An Answer unto Sir Thomas More's Dialogue. In 1532 Thomas More published a six volume Confutation of Tyndale's Answer, in which he alleged Tyndale was a traitor and a heretic."

The Fact is William Tyndale was executed for the charge of "heresy" by order of the Protestant (Anglican) K

Update 2:

The Fact is William Tyndale was executed for the charge of "heresy" by order of the Protestant (Anglican) King of England Henry VII in October 1536. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIT!

Update 3:

I meant Henry VIII in the previous edit.

Update 4:

@Farsight, yes that is correct, although there were other Bible translations other that the Latin Vulgate that the Church did approve such as the Armenian Bible which was done in the early 5th Century, and the First French, & German Translations were done in the Seventh Century.

I am just curious to see how many here are misinformed, and if they have enough integrity and humility to correct themselves.

Update 5:

@ Monkey <<they'd get exposed>>

How so? You seem to leave very unresourceful vague comments that are more opinion than actual answers. Thus my question was basically, if you believe the Church to have been opposed to the Bible being translated, to explain why that is, so now I ask again, Why is it that you believe the Church to be opposed to the Bible Translation?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    This question is a canard. Anglicans have no power to accuse heresy until they point the gun at themselves. And your lengthy Question exceeds Yahoo limits! Get over it and stop preaching the question. Ask the true Catholics, if you can discern who they are. It is not still-Presbyterian Hahn

    Traditional Catholics

    P.S. Catholic Faith was completed with Pius XII. Take that to the bank.

  • 1 decade ago

    Not me, though it is a wide spread belief in anti-Catholic circles.

    It is true that at one time, long, long ago, translation of scripture into a language other than Latin was forbidden, but this was back when Latin was the vernacular. As soon as it stopped being so, the Church began translating the bible into other languages, the earliest documented occurrence of this into Old English in the 700's.

    The Catholic Church continued a long tradition of carefully translating the bible into various languages, though even through much of the protestant reformation, the people knew enough Latin to understand what was being said in Church. During this time, the Church never truly forbade translation of scripture, but only declared that Church approval was needed first. This insured that no armchair scholar would try to do it and create a horrible mistranslation that mislead many people. When the Jesuits came along, they translated the bible into dozen of languages it had never been written in before.

    So no, the Catholic Church was never opposed to the bible being translated. That's a myth, though a fairly popular one. Why it matters so much to some, I don't know though. It's not like it would have mattered, since anyone living centuries ago who was well educated enough to read, was also well educated enough to understand Latin. Its not like these non-Latin speaking masses could have understood a bible written in their language, being illiterate, or ever afforded one before the invention of the printing press.

    Though some anti-Catholics mistakenly believe that the Church forbade translation of the bible during the protestant reformation, it was actually King Henry the VIII, a protestant, that forbade translation of scripture. He even had burned at the stake someone who translated the bible into English (Tyndale I think), but that is commonly attributed to the Catholic Church too.

  • Donald
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Not only were they opposed to the bible being translated but they also had anyone who translated the bible put to death.

    William Tyndale (sometimes spelled Tindall, Tindill, Tyndall; c. 1494 – 1536) was a 16th century scholar and translator who became a leading figure in Protestant reformism towards the end of his life. He was influenced by the work of Desiderius Erasmus, who made the Greek New Testament available in Europe, and Martin Luther.[1] Tyndale was the first to translate considerable parts of the Bible into English, for a public, lay readership. While a number of partial and complete translations had been made from the seventh century onward, particularly during the 14th century, Tyndale's was the first English translation to draw directly from Hebrew and Greek texts, and the first to take advantage of the new medium of print, which allowed for its wide distribution. This was taken to be a direct challenge to the hegemony of both the Roman Catholic Church and the English church and state. Tyndale also wrote, in 1530, The Practyse of Prelates, opposing Henry VIII's divorce on the grounds that it contravened scriptural law.

    In 1535, Tyndale was arrested by church authorities and jailed in the castle of Vilvoorde outside Brussels for over a year. He was tried for heresy, strangled and burnt at the stake in 1536.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yes, I can state that the Popes have always been against the translation of the Bible into vernacular languages that were not authorized, not translated correctly, and with entire books stripped from the original manuscripts.

    Who gave them this authority?

    Matthew 28:18-20

    Then Jesus approached and said to them, "All power in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age."

    Source(s): Authorized translations of the Bible have always been allowed in the vernacular as Greek, Latin, and Syriac (the language of Jesus) are have distinctive Rites among the many as the following article shows: "ANTIOCHIAN FAMILY OF LITURGICAL RITES The Church of Antioch in Syria (the ancient Roman Province of Syria) is considered an apostolic See by virtue of having been founded by St. Peter. It was one of the ancient centers of the Church, as the New Testament attests, and is the source of a family of similar Rites using the ancient Syriac language (the Semitic dialect used in Jesus' time and better known as Aramaic). Its Liturgy is attributed to St. James and the Church of Jerusalem." http://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/catholic_rites_... Unfortunately, it looks like the globalists are after Syria next and we know what happens to Christians when their puppets are in charge? God will win in the end but the suffering can be brutal at times.
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • PPP777
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    the first answer hit the nail on the head .

  • Jim
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Then why were bible translators from the middle ages burned at the stake.

  • 1 decade ago

    Aren't you about 400 years late, here?

    Source(s): The calendar
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    they'd get exposed

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.