Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 10 years ago

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone?

Why is it that ethno-nationalism is wonderful in the cases of Kenya, Israel, Japan, China, the Middle East, South America, etc. etc. etc. yet if a white person ever dares to even suggest setting aside a country for white people, they're automatically a nazi racist who hates freedom?

What kind of sense does that make?

Update:

There isn't a single "white" country in the world right now that isn't being flooded with non-white third world immigration and affirmative action programs.

Update 2:

Minny: South American countries are extremely nationalistic for their individual ethnic groups with the exception of Brazil. Latinos are a mix between Iberian(a mix between North African Arabs and European whites) and mongoloids from Asia that migrated and became native americans. They are not a mix between every race.

Update 3:

Pedro: White countries and only white countries are being flooded with non-white immigration. Blacks and latinos aren't flooding Japan or China with immigrants. The Middle East isn't being flooded with immigrants.

Yes, there is immigration to those countries from ethnic groups that aren't native, but not on nearly the scale that is happening in Europe and North America.

Update 4:

Jason: Who's arguing for nativism? Not me. I'm argue for an ethno-nationalist white country.

Besides, we legally conquered America. Indians don't own it anymore. "Whitey stole my land" is just the convenient excuse they can use to get out of bettering themselves and working to improve their communities.

Update 5:

Link: I'm not saying SA isn't diverse. You're putting words into my mouth. I'm saying they're ethno-nationalist. Cubans hate Mexicans. Nicaraguans hate Costa Ricans. Try arguing against what I -actually- said.

Update 6:

Gilliegrrl: What are you talking about, "no mongoloids migrated to America", what do you think native americans are? They aren't a unique race, they're Mongoloids.

Yeah, there are no "only white countries" and even suggesting a white only country is evil, bigoted, racist, etc. But take someone who advocated for say, black only countries, like Martin Luther King Jr. or Malcolm X, and they're heroes. Take someone who advocated Jewish only countries like Ariel Sharon or Benjamin Netanyahu, and they're firm allies in the war on terror. What is wrong with having a country that is for white people only?

What am I afraid of? I'm afraid that my culture is being wiped out by immigrants who refuse to assimilate, blacks who refuse to adopt our culture, whites who teach that our culture is wrong, that it caused all the ill of the world, etc. I want a place where Western culture is embraced and celebrated, where one can be proud of ones races achievements without being branded an evil racist.

13 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I agree, for ones culture to thribe and prosper you need to be around your own people, and I don't appreciate minorities taking over my native land in Europe and colony countries.

  • weise
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Africans In Asia

  • Ciph
    Lv 6
    10 years ago

    Also to the Japan thing. And Israel is hardly loved for their apartheid-like policies.

    South America has a lot of tension between the European colonial rulers and native indians. REad more on the topic, it's a hot debate.

    Technically, nativism in the USA would be American Indians, not white people.

  • 10 years ago

    You seriously are ignorant about South America aren't you. Perhaps, THE MOST diverse region in the world. The is no ethnic solidarity there.

    What you stated is irrelevant. They are just more nationalist. Nothing to do with race.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    10 years ago

    What race is South America for? Dont tell me hispanics because a hispanic is every race in world mixed together.

    What about Australia, New Zealand, Scandinavia?

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    Siberia? Iceland? Antarctica?

  • Jeff
    Lv 7
    10 years ago

    Actually there has been a lot of criticism against Japan for not being more open to minorities.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    That would be racist per every perceived minority in the world. Yet they keep claiming whites will be a minority by 2040 or whatever so maybe then we can get our own country and/or claim racism every time the white man/women is passed up for this or that.

  • 10 years ago

    There are lots of "white" people in every nation you mentioned.

    There are no "only white" countries.

    No "mongoloids" migrated to North America.

    What are you so afraid of?

    **EDIT**

    I'm a Cree indian. Immigrants wiped out our culture-why don't you white folk go back where you came from?

    **EDIT**

    BTW, Dr. King NEVER, not even once, suggested that there should be "black only countries". It's not nice to spread propaganda and untruths to try and support your flawed contention.

  • 10 years ago

    You haven't been to South America I take it.

    Source(s): Guess it show who is the superior race
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.