Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
23 Answers
- 10 years agoFavorite Answer
Nope. Just remove the anonymity. Abuse of the system is against community guidelines, and the abusing accounts (if there is someone with multiple accounts) can more easily be identified and depressed while maintaining the voting system if the thumbs were made more like the stars system.
Of course, that depends on whether one considers the voting system serving an actual purpose (a quasi-peer review system), or is just a novelty as anyone can read an answer and judge for themselves its quality.
- οικοςLv 710 years ago
Hardly worth the effort. The nice things about thumbs up is that they boost your score when you get "best answer". Thumbs down just let people vent in many cases. However, under "Pets", they might save an animal's life, if the questioner pays attention to them.
- DavidLv 710 years ago
I think they should be eliminated, or at least eliminate the 'hiding' system.
It seems pointless to me and just a bad example of unnecessary censorship. If someone clearly violates the site rules they are reported and their answer quickly deleted; that's fine. Yahoo has the right to set their own rules and if you violate them they have the right to restrict your usage of their services.
But to hide an answer simply because people disagree with it? I have never agreed with that.
If the thumb system were meaningless, or continued to benefit the best answer in terms of extra points, it would be much better. But hiding an answer just for having 5 more down than up is wrong.
- antarcticiceLv 710 years ago
If answers implemented the same system used by many forums that logs ip address against account you would see troll/denier activity drop away to nothing overnight. Have to say I love Ratna Rai answer
"loosers always gets thumbs down" P.S. it's "losers", hmmm That's almost funny in a poetic justice sort of way.
"always" from an account created today, as I've said before trolls are not very bright.
The way the current system is setup thumbs mean little and absurd high or low numbers, especially in any question Jim is involved in mean virtually nothing and I am certainly not the only one to have noticed that.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- DaveHLv 510 years ago
On a scale of things that actually matter in the world, I don't think it even makes the list.
Some people are clearly going to the time and trouble to game this system (why they would bother is completely beyond me) ... so knowing that it's not representative you should just ignore it, and them.
- RioLv 610 years ago
Unless you have a strong affiliation such as political clout or dignitary and marketing products.Who in the world would care?
I think its a bummer that statistics are used as a crux and not a tool.
- JimZLv 710 years ago
Thumbs downs don't work well in religion, politics or GW because it is too heated IMO. I gave Peg a thumbs up. If they could think of a way to remove the anonymity that would be great and hiding answers is just annoying. I had to open up Dook to give him his obligatory thumbs down. I think they should be eliminated. Clearly alarmists suffer more from them on YA so I am sure they would tend to be more annoyed by them than I. I don't usually give thumbs downs in spite of what some have suggested. Dook is the exception. If he stopped blocking, I wouldn't even bother to thumb him down unless he really deserved it which I must admit is quite often.
- pegminerLv 710 years ago
I agree with A.M.P. that it should not be anonymous and answers should never be hidden "due to low rating." To hide answers just invites abuse and it's clear that many people that deny global warming abuse the system. There may be some who believe in AGW that abuse it also, but since there are fewer liars on the believer side there are also fewer abusers. From the answer to the previous question it's clear that many "skeptics" will automatically thumb down people they don't like, regardless of the answer.
- AWOL liberalLv 410 years ago
I think we should add a tax and some fees to the thumbs up and down system!
- BobLv 410 years ago
People who write unpopular comments think the system should be eliminated.
Also, people who do not take criticism well.