Serious question that requires thought....?

It's a stupid argument people use to support creationism. I believe in God but I also believe in evolution as the two beliefs Can coexist... Fish evolved from other fish that are still around. The gorilla and monkey and chimpanzee probably share one common ancestor that they all branched off of, as did cats, dogs and so on and so forth... Take man for example. There is proof (and I mean evidence you could touch with your hands) that man evolved in several forms (homoerectus, homosapien, neanderthals, etc.)

Maybe Some Chimpanzees Didn't Evolve?? And Then The Humans Had Childeren Then The World Got More Populated?? :D

Actually, it's a remarkably silly question that Creationists who should know better have been asking (and we have been answering) for a very long time.

Modern-day humans and modern-day great apes have a common ancestor about 6,000,000 years ago.

We diverged from the branch that would eventually become the great apes that long ago into a branch that went through a variety of hominids to arrive at modern humans, Homo Sapiens Sapiens, about 50,000 years ago.

The contemporary great apes went through a similar evolutionary process, with a variety of ancestors along their own evolutionary chain.

Although we are genetically close to modern chimps, we are also quite different.

If there were sufficient numbers of chimps in the wild to continue their branch successfully (doubtful), they would continue to evolve...But not into human beings.

Your 3 questions are too in contact and different to warrant the solutions you're finding for. additionally your questions are jointly, too a lot difficulty to respond to for 10 factors. so which you are not getting my "A" answer, basically a rapid inexpensive one. a million All politicians are polarized, voters who swap votes between events shop the politicians conscious of a changing voters. the present situation is far less related to the unpopularity of the incumbent president and extra related to the undeniable fact that he's a "lame duck" as is the vp. 2 comparisons between cutting-area usa and historic Rome are tenuous at maximum suitable. historic previous would not repeat itself, some similarities that look significant ruin down under scrutiny. If a useful often used got here back from victory in Iraq and commenced stacking the Senate along with his acquaintances, then i'd evaluate your arguement extra beneficial. 3 at the start, a million/2 of human beings do not vote. era. they have already found out that in spite of and whoever gets elected, little will replace. that's genuinely not that undesirable. it ability that a million/2 of human beings sense that their lives are unaffected by ability of what is going on interior the hals of ability. Idealists hate this, and easily some human beings do not vote out of frustration, yet maximum folk of non-voters would desire to not be bothered, which idicates existence is merely fantastic for them and that they have got bettter issues to do than worry a pair of bunch of partisan monkeys flinging poo at one yet another.

The question that I ask is how can we start off from being a single celled organism to a fish to an ape or etc.?

The bing bang theory sounds ridiculous.

Look at this world, its nature is created so perfect the sun is distanced so perfectly from Earth. There has to be a creator.

Sooo many answers already, but here.

It's because some groups of our common ancestor migrated to other parts of Africa, therefore adapting to their environment accordingly and becoming a form of early humanoid, whereas others stayed where they were, evolving into apes. Pretty simple, really.

Go ahead and give the second response "best answer" because we're like cosins to the chimps.

we didnt evolve from chimps, we evolved from a common ancestor.

If you look at our face carefully, we look like an ape, for real.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/faq/cat0...