does anyone else think I'm correct in my 2nd amendment opinion?

You're right. The 2nd Amendment articulates an individual right to bear arms. That right is not limited by the militia clause.

However, if you think that means that guns cannot be subject to any regulation, you are very, very wrong.

You are right.

The purpose of the 2nd Amendment was that the Founders wanted the people to own arms, so they could bear them in service of the militia if needed.

Clearly the intent is the arms should be suitable for use in the militia.

A musket was a fine militia weapon in the 1790s. But in the 21st Century, the AR-15 with high capacity magazines makes a much more suitable weapon for the citizen militia.

"Steven," Did you know that we have a President that ISN'T a Socialist just like I'm not a socialist and almost every Democrat you will run across ISN'T a Socialist like yourself. So it isn't just other Socialists that don't agree with you it's also good old fashioned Capitalists like Obama and me and the Democrats that don't agree with you! And for your information, the FUCKING2nd amendment actually "says" "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Now are you a militia? No, you're a punk, and the 2nd amendment is VAGUE to the point of contention. How's that?

I believe the Constitution has been around over 220 years and none of the Bill of Rights has ever been repealed in all that time. The 2nd Amendment puts no restrictions on bearing arms. Even Stephen Breyer, one of the most liberal justices, says the 2nd Amendment is so plain there is little room for denying it unless Congress repeals it and that is extremely difficult requiring a two-third majority in both Houses or having two-thirds of state legislatures passing it.

The purpose of the Second Amendment is to protect us from the government. From Examination of Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, 1787: "The Supreme Power in America cannot enforce unjust laws because the whole body of people are armed and constitute a force superior to the regular troops".

The Second amendment needs to be amended. No civilian should own a killing machine. Many States have abolished the death penalty which is official killing. Hunting for 'sport' defenceless (They don't have a gun) animals is wrong. The NRA should be disbanded and arms manufacturers banned from making all those silly handguns with their 'Sure-Grip' stocks and XX 100 blow your head clean off super whizzbang chrome trigger guard, intruder remover plus bonus handy holster.

who's any mortal to supply an opinion on Shrimad Bhagavat Gita that's Shruti. you have given your interpretation in accordance on your information and your point of information turns into specific once you do this. you are able to know Shrimad Bhagawat Gita purely once you're Shri Krishna. No lesser mortal can comprehend it interior a similar meaning as to what Shri Krishna had in techniques while He uttered what He uttered. same is the situations with Shri Adi Shankaracharya. that's silly to evaluate our poverty in know-how with those blessed Souls. i will purely say I journey bliss as quickly as I pay attention those Shrutis and Smritis uttered in spite of if by way of a honest or a non-honest. The meaning that a honest can see will continuously be distinctive from what a faithless can see. they are the two sides of the coin staying at the same time finding at distinctive direction, however the nicely worth of the coin is set purely while the two sides are obtainable. i p.c. you and you p.c. me to make that composite entire with omnipresence.

WRONG!!!! Protection needed against the goverment...yes...of Great Britian! Did you miss Civics class????

You are to smart to be a Socialist.