steven

I saw a guy use this term on a television show when a dna test showed that he was 14% sub-saharan African. I never heard the term and I wonder if somebody could give me some clarification.

My Super Glide was stolen and I really like the look of the Dyna Switchback but I don't feel like getting

a bike that HD designed mostly for women. Could anyone help me out with their opinions about the Switchback?

Once I'm old enough for social security I'll get another 16000 American dollars. What I'd like to know is

can I live in Seoul on 15000 American per year? About how much could I expect to pay for rent?

It seems as though the more religious a person claims to be,the meaner the person.

I mean even if you're not a believer can you see that having people believe they will have to pay for

their actions can somtimes be a good thing?.

I mean one day it's the Unions that are the enemy,the next it's the democrats. And the next day they

are railing against the Big Banks and corporate greed. Pick a freaking side! Nah don't bother, no matter what you say we know whose side you're on. Big Business, no matter how many times they step on the working and middle class you always manage to massage your non-conscience into believing that the Repugs and tea-party has you covered.

In the mid 70's had himself shot with a single .22 bullet. I love performance art and think it's time to go to another level. get shot 4 times with a .38 cal. bullet. I know alot of work goes into these pieces

and want to not only stay alive but stay conscious throughout and describe each bullets pain and feel

after each round. I was shot one time,but it was robbery not art,so I have an idea of what to expect. But what say you,it will be serious art for me about the transformative action of being shot but does

an artist ever have to explain his art?

I'm going to be up front and tell you that I'm a socialist. But that doesn't mean many other socialists

agree with me. So here is my question. I've read the 2nd amendment and I think the anti-gun lobbies

are incorrect in saying things like "they meant it for hunting or for a regulated-milita." I believe it means exactly what it says, that we have the right to own and bear arms. And it says that the reason we have that right is in case a majority of Americans find they need protection against the government.

Another thing the anti-gun groups say is they were talking about "hunting weapons and not automatic weapons." And that "our forefathers had no idea that future weapons would enable a man to shoot 30 rounds

per second." I think that is lazy thinking,these men had seen in their lifetime weapons go from clumsy

muskets to long rifles that were very accurate. I believe these men envisioned a day when guns would hold

more then one round. By 1780 almost all gunmakers were trying to create a weapon that would hold more than one bullet.

Well I could go on but I'll quit and put it to you- am I wrong or right?