Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Would you consider this observation as a positive theoretical deduction based on perception of an actual?
Time is a Definitive infinite. Time is not a Physical Property, and has no means of which too move. Time will remain, still/without motion/static, infinitely, It can only be defined, in relation to a relative physical measurement of a relative physical movement through it, of one relative measured moment to the next of Now. Time is Defined by relative applied measurement; but will remain infinitely.
Drypress: Respectfully, Maybe in yours; however, I believe that a Theoretical Deduction is the Statement derived from a basic Premise.
Any statement can be contradicted according to your perception and accepted frame of reality.
Curt : It has just been introduced. You can define an Infinite, but only in a matter of moments.
Your Second observation; please re-read it, and comprehend the entirety of its essence, so you may understand that I do so agree. Time Perception is the premise of the statement. It can only be Defined if you add a measurement.
Time is Not a physical property. It will be here infinitely, stationary in relation to the reality that moves through it
2 Answers
- 8 years agoFavorite Answer
"Definitive infinite" is not a philosophical term. It is found in internet searches, but not as a term you can use here. What is it, anyway, this "definitive" infinite? Is that an infinite that is definitive of all other infinites?
Because you define time as having no physical property, it is a contradiction to say it "will remain still/without motion/static/". Only a thing with physical properties can do that.
As for your statement that "It can only be defined, in relation to a relative physical measurement of a relative physical movement through it, of one relative measured moment to the next of Now," you might want to consider that this has already been stated more elegantly, as "time perception";
"The apprehension of the protensive or durational character of the data of experience." Dictionary of Philosophy http://www.ditext.com/runes/index.html
- NathanCoppedgeLv 68 years ago
First of all, it's not a deduction unless you have premises. If you don't have premises, it's an 'assumption' or 'statement'.
I could contradict the statement by saying that all real things are physical. Unless you disagree.
You might say, it's bound to be discovered by science eventually. We don't need to believe that. And it doesn't need a particular scale.
That help? That's my perspective.
