How much longer will these hairbrained deniers think the Earth is cooling.?

"your heroes lie and cherry pick data"

Unlike Mike Mann with his hockey stick?

Or James Hansen with all of his predictions?

Or Phil Jones losing his data when a FOIA request is made?

Or the IPCC positing pipedreams about the Himalayen glaciers as fact?

We're having warm snaps? Floods? Hurricanes tornadoes etc? OMG the world is gonna end!!!! What new natural disasters will come next? Will we start getting fire rain? Will we get upward rains?

Oh wait, all of those things, other than the last two put in for fun grins, have happened since the beginning of time. Point in fact the general frequency and intensity have been trending down of late and NOT up.

Once I start seeing ACCURATE predictive models then I will begin to believe these guys know enough about the subject to justify some of the policy changes.

I don't think the earth is cooling. I think it is warming slightly.

But I imagine that you will have the global cooling stuff as long as you have the world is going to end crap. In fact, with crap movies like "The Day After Tomorrow", there are a bunch of people pretending that CO2 is going to cause another ice age. Some of the people on YOUR side have said this.

And for all of the linear regressions and temp data that the warmers have shown me, I can agree that there is warming, BUT I have seen nothing that would indicate exponential warming.

In fact, if you all believe in this exponential warming so much, I have to wonder why you would direct me to a link that used linear regression. LOL. SERIOUSLY!!!

Again the facts are displayed with the Royal Society and the United States National Academy of Sciences: http://news.yahoo.com/science-academies-explain-gl...

" ... The report, released on Thursday, addresses new issues such as the recent slowing in the increase of world temperatures and how heat-trapping gases are connected to extreme weather. Increases in extreme weather, melting glaciers, rising seas and oceans getting more acidic are already happening, the 36-page report said. ... "

Nothing new in their report.

" ... And those changes "are expected to increase greater warming and will threaten food production, freshwater supplies, coastal infrastructure and especially the welfare of the huge population currently living in low-lying areas," the report said. ... "

All of these things have happened before in history.

" ... The report said that while the rate of warming is slower in the 2000s than it was in the 1990s it doesn't negate the 150 years of observations that show the world is warming. The report also says that more the 90 percent of the heat trapped by greenhouse gases lately has been absorbed into the oceans' deep water, which for a while slows surface warming but not the long-term trend. ... "

1) The National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society have been in repeat mode since 1988.

2) 150 years of observations? Let's try 25 years and stop exaggerating that science has been as intently involved in climate science for 150 years.

3) 150 years of warming? They would have to leave out all of the cooling periods. Right?

4) Where is that deep ocean warming located?

Same old scientific jargon C.

Lest we forget who Seth Borenstein is? "Mister Climate Emergency" himself maybe?

The science isn't settled because the same organizations keep repeating the same old information that is terribly biased in the first place.

For exactly as long as the hairbrained scientists collect data like this:

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2...

#Time series (hadcrut4) from 1850 to 2014

#Selected data from 2001

#Least squares trend line; slope = -0.00105415 per year

As an aside, even the more logically challenged might be able to work out from that graph how you can have the warmest year on record while the trend is falling. But I am not holding my breath. They have an agenda to maintain.

They stick with a currently fashionable anti-science lie as long they are reminded of it on Wattsup or one of their other usual cut-and-paste blogs, or until they get tired of acceptors showing what dishonest nitwits they are with it. Then the shell game moves on. Somewhere before reaching the 188th myth here

http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php they go back to start. This does not apply to posters with 7 year old brains and no ability or interest in telling truth from lies, or even in appearing to be able to do so, such as MadMaxx and Sagebrain. They are too feeble-minded to even pretend to grasp more than a fraction of the standard anti-science lie grab bag.

Probably, they'll quit with the "it's cooling" the next time we have a truly, unambiguously warmer year, which will likely be the next really strong El Nino.

Of course, that will only reset the clock. A few years after that, they'll start up again with the "no warming since...", just with a different set point.

My A$%$ is freezing off and the snow is frozen solid. Sort of makes me think it's cold but I might be having an hallucination. If I am there are several million others experience it too.

I'm not seeing any posted graphs of temperature data that you've Linked C. This might be where you are making your mistake, watching old Alarmist videos instead of looking at the current empirical data.

RSS satellite data - Lower Tropical Global Mean - 1985 to present. (about 30 years of data)

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/rss/from:1985/to/...

-----------------------

I think you mean "harebrained" (I.E. having no more sense than a hare)

How much longer will they think the Earth is cooling? As long as they want to "think" that the earth is cooling. (just because they "think" that the earth is cooling does not make it so.)