Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Barry
Lv 5
Barry asked in SportsWrestling · 7 years ago

Wasn't Cesaro vs Sami Zayn meant to be 2/3 Falls?

Fans of NXT will know that a few weeks back NXT held their first live televised event called NXT ArRival. There were 3 matches scheduled, and another 3 were also featured. Advertised was Bo Dallas vs Adrien Neville in a Ladder match for the NXT Championship, Paige vs Emma for the NXT Women's Championship, and Cesaro vs Sami Zayn in their 2nd Two out of Three Falls match.

While I'm not complaining about the quality of the Zayn vs Cesaro match (it was match of the night), I was surprised that even though it was advertised, the match was only a one-fall match, and so when Cesaro seized the victory I was expecting even more, and was then puzzled as to why the match had ended after only one fall. So why was the match, which was advertised as 2/3 Falls, changed to just a standard 1-on-1 match?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    WWE Raw is a live televised show that controls the network when on.. This is why Raw can go on 10-15 minutes longer then schedueled.

    NXT on the other hand is not allowed to go longer then schedueled like Raw is so when it came down to decision time keep the match going or end thw show they told the ref to end it so he warned the wrestlers and they went a bit longer before the first fall and ended it

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    no

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.