Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

true asked in Politics & GovernmentMilitary · 5 months ago

   Why do you think that people don't accept that in order to be certain countries in a war they need to use atomic bomb?

 Obviously against Russia it wouldn't be a matter of if nuclear weapons would be used there would be a matter of when and who would draw first blood first. When you look at countries like Vietnam even if the US had public support from the US citizens between the Vietnamese tunnels and the fact that the Viacom were not going to quit no matter if they had a hundred times more casualties than the US to be able to win that war in the US would have needed to just drop an atomic bomb . When you look at Afghanistan and Iraq between the desert tunnels all the bomb s some of the tunnels are so well constructed that no matter how many bombs are dropped from above it's still won't reach the enemy. Ideally it's is best not to go to war but against your opponents the only way to be able to beat them is with an atomic bomb. Look at Japan realistically I wouldn't see Japan surrendering at the US not dropped in atomic bomb. I'm not saying the US would lose a world with these countries but I'm saying the war would never end

1 Answer

Relevance
  • 5 months ago

    What makes you think nuclear bombs are such a big deal?

    The convential bombing of several German cities like dresdin or japanese cities like Tokoyo, did more damage and killed more people than either of the nuclear weapons used

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.