angibabi113

I want to block myspace, any ideas how that can be done?

(yes, I know it was probably supposed to be whom!)

I don't like Obama, I'm no fan by a stretch, in fact he frightens me a bit, but having said that do you really find him to be arrogant?

Coming from a single mom and having gone through school on a scholarship?

I mean that seems a stretch, really lame, especially for Rove.

Someone recently said that the children are the ones losing the most (and I do agree)

Having said that were the traditional views on gender and responsibilities largely for the sake of the children?

Will today's kids end up less healthy than their predecessors?

Cnn reports that studies indicate the man's career is always given more priority over the woman's. Even in situations where the woman earns more.

Shouldn't logic dictate that the higher earner's opportunities take priority?

I watched this British show once called 1945 house and it was so amazing! A modern family has to live in a home customized to 1945 just as the people at that time did. It was awe inspiring the sacrifice and hard scrabbleness these folks showed.

One of the things I learned was that even after the war the British people willingly chose to continue to ration necesseities for so many years afterwards.

How long was that? And Can you see anyone doing that now in a similar situation or was that just indicitive of the people in that era?

I'm sorry but I truly think women are much more decisive than men. Especially around matters of the heart. Women just make up their mind and go for it.

Men seem flaky about love and relationships.

Who do you regard as more decisive (in general not just about relationships - though I'm cool with you specifying if you feel the need)

When thinking about the modern woman, consider how much choice she now possesses compared to her predecessors.

With the advancements women have made in career, freedom and social choice, has it cost women everything?

Rarely is anything 100% gain, usually you have to lose something in exchange.

So what have women lost in return for the benefits they've gained?

Or have they lost anything at all?

simply refusing to go with men you find no capable of supporting you in the lifestyle you expect ?

(Inspired by a previous answer to a gold digger question)

I personally think there is, as it's not particularly wrong to insist a man be capable and responsible in employment (as that sheds light on other characteristics) before allowing yourself to fall in love with him, while purposely going after ONLY men of extraordinary wealth with little regard for anything else seems to me more like 'gold digging'

but am I wrong? If you refuse to consider a man without some financial security does that make you a gold digger?

I understand it was very similar to the same themes expressed by Homer.

Was Homer's work also destroyed on purpose? So was it the homoerotic edge or was it the fact that it was by a female?

meaning an infant and 9 years old. I mean if you have to work (of course in a perfect universe you'd stay home with the baby for 5 years)

But with one year of college behind you, which direction would you advise a woman to go to earn a decent living but maintain a presence in the home?

I had wanted to go into journalism but I guess I can forget about that. Way too many irregular shifts and hours away from the family.

Ideas? anyone?

http://omg.yahoo.com/sjp-s-dress-debacle/news/9521...

Or is this a serious issue / concern in this particular line of work?

I'm just wondering, if this is considered silly, then does it effect the way American women are viewed in general.

And if so does that mean black females got the vote at the same time as their white counterparts?

Do you think the Hillary supporters will go in the McCain direction over this?

Or both?

In your opinion which gender is more easily manipulated by peer pressure?

I know these may be a bit traditional for folks these days, but I like

Jane Elizabeth, but daddy wants Sarah Jane

What do you think? Which sounds better?

I'm about 10 wks along now and it's been 8 years since my last baby. I may need to seriously polish up on my baby expertise here.

there's a big stink about baby Suri Cruise still drinking from a bottle along with a sippy cup.

Is 2 years old really way too old to still be using a bottle?

I have forgotten so much!

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,180...

What do you think?

Is this ethical?

You decide.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,180...

Is this appropriate / legal / fair in your mind?

What I mean is, if you bombard the public with messages and harsh judgements criticizing a behavior for thirty years, will the general public eventually respond to the vocal campaign and automatically equate shame to the behavior?

because it has simply been adopted as the social norm of thought?

Is it feasible to believe that the general public can be controlled in such a manner over the course of enough time?

Through nothing more than shame and reinforcement of a message?

Or am I being too Orwellian?