Dr. Atheist .PhD

A person that excludes the possibility of the existence of A because apparently, A is doesn't seem useful to him.

So because I (me, person, with limited knowledge, limited resources, limited power, limited intelligence, limited comprehension, limited experience, limited EVERYTHING!) cannot see or understand the usefulness of A, I must assume that it does not exist. How flawed and or logical is that argument? ANd what type of mind is that? Why?

Its their golden argument, the only one which they hold to tightly to say *** god, ok cool np - where would you hold on to if this hypothesis wasn't here? What would you do if you had no scientist in a white robe with glasses telling you what to believe because he "proved" it, what would you do? Even if it's a theory that proves (it rly does) many things it doesn't prove all it says it is proving, but that's for another time.

I'm having a problem understanding why someone who thinks his ancestor was an ape shouldn't be treated like one, I mean, as much as I wouldn't treat a dog like a man, I wouldn't treat an ape like a man...is it wrong?

Crucifixion did not kill Jesus, he was alive when brought down from the cross, he was put in the tomb ALIVE!! so why is it crazy to find it empty? I'll give the possibility that je could move a 1 ton rock, he wasn't the only one among his peers to do crazy stuff like that, does that mean he's God??

If we're all just animals after all, OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING! Why should we be morally responsible towards a man before an animal? Since were all the same or very similar (97% same DNA!, although that's the shiittiest argument ever, we share 50% DNA with a banana..) someone explain OBJECTIVELY why is it morally justified to act morally responsible towards other apes like us and not as much towards dogs and flies..we should feel as bad when we kill a dog a cat a fly or a ape (us)...

boom accross the world, jesus is back and hes alive, what would you do?

what are the things you hate the most, despise the most, and what you see as the epitome of the ridicule of religion?

Dont say from my morals, dont say because its for evolution purposes, don't say because its obvious you cant kill, where do you back up your moral grounds? When do you know if what you;re thinking is wrong? How do you question your set of beliefs?

Since morality needs to be objective, (or else anyone will just go do anything that seems morally justifiable to him, don't make me lists examples get an education) where does its basis come from?

Where is that objective morality? Where do you get it form? Not form your feelings, or judgement or wtv, since you cant trust your own judgement or else it will lead to chaos Morally speaking, tell me where do you get it from..

Atheists drop that every time, it's really funny how it clearly shows their ignorance and lack of judgement, since they consider the universe or god to be the same (no one really understands the universe) and no need to mention no one really knows what god is...so the obvious submental fallacy "if god didnt need a creator why did the universe did? " ..how bad is that argument?

Muslims, please go all out with all your strongest convincing arguments so I can understand and get a little push to become a Muslim, I am Jewish by the way...and I want to become Muslim, please enlighten me...

Why are the apes the only ones of have evolved to become humans? we can clearly observe the absence on earth of other species similar to human beings in mental and physical (although mental is the most important point) - why aren't there any other other types of species that have evolved as humans did, IM referring to that same intellectual LEAP, don't say blue moths turned black moths, or a bird turning into another bird..Im talking about

1) The intellectual LEAP we made from being apes

2) The exclusivity of our existence (evolution) amongst other animals

Thank you

If religion was the result of the advantages produced by natural selection (inevitably or else we wouldn't be here) can we assume that the parameter or advantage produced by NS which religion is a by-product of and not the direct cause, that religion in its "essence" was a naturally selected advantageous trait?

They're different. if you cant see that, go back to the 1st grade. How do you see that difference? How do you explain it and the confusion people get into when blending them in 1 bs soup..

They found the gospel of James (look it up) how come it is specifically explaining that what the apostles were saying (fishermen, real ignorant savages) is wrong? HE specifically mentions that the way the apostles reacted is ENTIRELY WRONG, THEY DID NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING. SAME FOR THE GOSPEL OF JUDA...Why do Christians ignore it? I know they always cherry pick wtv they need from wherever they need (even idol-worshipping was permitted) ..illuminate this difficulty please...

Could the universe have been conceived or come into existence another way? Could molecules and cells and energy and physical laws been otherwise? If so, could the universe still be here?

Could the universe have been conceived or come into existence another way? Could molecules and cells and energy and physical laws been otherwise? If so, could the universe still be here?