Will some of you who have characterized bush as the lesser of two evils vs. kerry, please explain to me how?

If you read some of the misinformation that still is out there, I guess it's obvious why some think Bush is the lesser of two evils. Kerry the flip-flopper versus Bush the straight shooter???

Hardly. Bush said he did not favor nation-building (flip). He now favors nation-building (flop).

Bush is against a department of homeland security (flip). He subsequently favored a department of homeland security (flop).

Or, the reason for invading Iraq is because of the threat of WMDs (flip). Now the reason is because we want to help them build a democracy (side-flop). Tomorrow it will be because....

How about this--"we do not do any wiretapping without warrants." (flip) "We are wiretapping without warrants." (flop)

Frankly, the concern about flip-flopping is foolishness and I for one am tired of the lame rhetoric that defends Bush at all costs.

Would you really rather have someone who makes a decision based on little or no evidence, and then stubbornly refuses to change it? Do you really want someone who lets his staff decide to sell the ports to Dubai, and then stubbornly refuses to consider that the decision might be a security threat?

Give me a thoughtful and honest person in the white house any time, whether republican, democratic, or independent.

Rahul Dravid is a cricketer with a wealth of journey, he's asserted to be a surprising guy or woman who gets alongside with all people and is respected by way of all people who has something to do with cricket, be it the followers, present day gamers from world huge and officers in any respect levels of the cricketing international. He have been given this appreciate from his contributions no longer basically to the Indian cricket group yet to the interest as an entire world huge. you should walk the streets here in the Caribbean Islands and all people is familiar with who he's 'The Wall', Rahul Dravid. Now having those features or features and a love for the interest of cricket and an techniques-set that made him the type of fulfillment is the reason to me why Rahul Dravid made a weaker finding outfit in assessment to different communities in Rajasthan Royals (little question the likes of Brad Hodge and Shane Watson helped) the fulfillment they replaced into in this version of the IPL. merely he's an especially good captain. Rohit Sharma, commentators save praising his expertise, to be easy once I see lots of the photos he have performed he's somewhat proficient. he's likewise an especially good fielder and how he includes himself he quite has a reliable head on his shoulder relating to the interest of cricket. Rohit's group is finished of stars who've journey that no different group (possibly basically Chennai) can journey. So in assessment to Dravid his paintings may be much less confusing because of the fact the chief, yet you nonetheless could execute. the factor is with Rohit however you spot he takes extra accountability to get runs how he's the captain, that's a reliable factor. they are the two proficient, Dravid made his call already however.

A true blind man cannot see, where on earth did you come up with Kerry is evil, just look at what is happening today and think about what could have been. Where on earth did you come up with Kerry is anti gun. There is so much rhetoric here I just wish people would look at the facts. and besides Kerry went hunting and didn't shoot anybody. Now thats a fact jack

Alot of people (I believe) just voted for Bush because he started the war and they felt he could finish it. I really wasn't for either candidate but we know what Bush already started at least Kerri would have had the chance to maybe make up for it for the mess he Bush started. Seems anything in the government anymore is one big LIE!!!!

I have no idea. The only explination could be that Kerry wasn't the best representation for our party. But, even if that was true, there is no way Bush would be the lesser of two evils.

I think it was Bush's ability to scare people into voting for him - or create anti gay wedge agendas. I think the more toxic he became, the better 35 to 37% of the voting public liked him. Kerry was not as gifted as Bush when it came to styling his candidacy as being the one way to save 'Murka from terra. Kerry did not result to scare and fear tactics or appeal to the worst in people. Bush did that handsomely.

Who knows what Kerry stands for? At least when Bush says something you can count on it, even if it is something we don't want.

Kerry: "yes I voted for war just before I voted against it?"

Kerry don't even know what he stands for.

Give us a democrat we can count on. Someone with some morals. Give us Democrat Joe Manchin.

i dont really care for either but we are worse off with Bush as our DICTATOR

lesser vs. kerry?no.lesser vs. sudam?maybe........

Bush is pro gun, nuff said.