Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

ETHICAL Q: [2-part] Say you're the E.R. doctor in a TRIAGE situation...??

And there are two patients in very critical condition between Life and Death. Do you:

[1]

A.] Help the one who is almost dying? or,

B.] Save the one who has a chance of living?

Support your response in either case.

[2] Now, suppose they are BOTH RELATED to you, do you save:

[D] Your sibling [brother or sister]?; or

[E] Your own child?

Support your response in either case.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    From working in a hospital, I can tell you that this is a question of standard medical procedure, not ethics. The one that is almost dying will more than likely get written off, while the efforts are spent on the other patient that has the better odds of survival.

    Now, part 2: again, it comes down to standard medical doctrine: it would depend (since you didn't specify) on which patient has the better odds of survival.

    In my personal opinion, I would *want* to save my sibling, as I could always have more children.

  • 1 decade ago

    Situ 1 - I would choose to assist the one is has the better chance of living. Why? Simple math - why allow two people to die when one can die and the other can survive? (See, you said SAVE the one with the chance, but only HELP the one who is near death...so chances are that person may not end up saved!)

    Situ 2 - would never happen. When family is brought to a hospital, the doctor is removed so as to prevent any foul ups from happening due to shock, etc... If forced to make the choice I would choose my child. Why? because this is where my genes are being passed on - not via my sister or brother.

  • 1 decade ago

    why are you a) giving test questions? b) asking a naiive question that we doctors can't answer? you cannot know for certainty who has a chance of living vs. almost dying. you use your triage evaluative skills and tend to the one who needs the most immediate attention. if a person is unable to breathe, that's your first choice, as is the cardiac person. if you have to chose between the two, you have to make a quick call based on observational experience which has to deal with best chances.

  • noway
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    it's not stupid. These are good questions!

    If they're were not related then I would save the person who has a chance at living. But if one of them was my child, I would save my child. My kids are priority over everyone in the world, no matter what!

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • timjim
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    I get help in both cases.

    Next question

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I get help...hahaha

    Ok, seriously, it doesn't matter what i say now, because what I do will probably be different.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Do your own homework.

    No one's going to fall for this one.

  • 1 decade ago

    This is stupid.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.