Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

In the same line as Greencoke's question If it is unhealthy to eat sweets and smoke should the government?

outlaw those things. It would make the people here more healthy and cut down on heart failure. Should they also make eating fruit and oatmeal manditory?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I think its a violation of my rights to tell me what I can and cant do with my own body.

    If I can LEGALLY have an abortion, cause I have a legal choice, then I should LEGALLY be able to eat 40 bigmacs and smoke 2 packs a day if I want to.

    Legislating what people do inside their own homes, or what they consume is going TOO far!!!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The government has as much power to legislate what we can/can't do as we let them. It's illegal to smoke crack, there's all sorts of things we aren't allowed to do because the majority of the population deems it necessary to ban.

    Do I think they could, yes, but only if we allowed it. A good example would be alcohol, for a time government made that illegal then repealed it. I don't think the general public would allow such legislation to be pushed through though in this case.

    But, they have made laws for such things as nutritional values and such to fall into certain parameters, so who knows?

    Fwiw I don't think it's right for them to do so, but doesn't make them any less able to.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.