Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

yars232c asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Is the price of freedom Iraq is to pay include loss of control and rights to it's oil?

I recall before Bush invaded Iraq because of WMD and Saddam being so gad darn evil and the Iraquis were begging for help. George said "We hear you and we are coming" to the people of Iraq.

He further said (I know I saw him say it on TV) that in no uncertain terms that Iraq's oil would 1) pay for the war, and 2) belongs to the people of Iraq.

So, why then, does Iraq own it's oil, but will not have after the war any control or rights to it? They are passing a US backed law that foriegn companies that invest in Iraq have unfettered authority to their oil.

I knew Bush was telling the truth when he said over and over again freeing Iraq from a dictator had nothing to do with thier oil.

What do you think?

http://www.handsoffiraqioil.org/

Update:

"Licensing contracts of exploration, development and production, form the backbone of this law, hence it is vital to emphasise the role of the Council of Representatives in the approval of such contracts; similar to what is adopted in the rest of the world. It is regrettable to notice that the authority of the council is restricted to the enacting of the law and the approval of international agreements only."

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I'd say the bottom line is that the US invaded a sovereign nation based upon lies, and is now holding Iraq hostage for their oil. Unless the Iraq Parliament refuses to sign and there has been increased protest for them to refuse. The only one I know of who protested it in our congress was Dennis Kucinich.

    For those that say Iraq oil production is controlled by OPEC... it is now, the Iraqi Hydrocarbons Law, more commonly known as the Iraq Oil Law, would mean that Iraq could no longer be a member of OPEC.

    The Iraq Oil Law (Highlights):

    -- Iraq National Oil Company would have exclusive control of only about 17 of Iraq's approximately 80 known oil fields. Remainder controlled by foreign interests.

    -- Allows foreign interests (mainly US and Britain) to take 50% control of Iraq's oil reserves and takes control away from, thus destabilizes, the Iraq federal central government.

    -- US oil companies can exercise long-term (30+ year) contracts without approval by the Iraqi Government

    -- Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs) give foreign firms 70 per cent of the oil revenues to recover their initial investments and subsequently allow them 20 per cent of the profits without any tax or restrictions on the transferring of funds abroad."

    -- Federal Oil and Gas Council (representatives from the foreign oil companies), not the Iraqi government, will have authority to approve (their own) contracts.

    -- The Council, not Iraq government, will control production levels, so Iraq cannot be a part of OPEC anymore.

    -- Foreign companies would not have to invest their earnings in Iraq, hire Iraqi workers, or partner with Iraqi companies."

    -- The Iraqi government would not have control over oil company operations inside Iraq. Any disputes would be referred instead to pro-industry international arbitration panels.

    -- No contracts would be public documents

    Iraqi "Hydrocarbon Law" - This version passed the Iraq Cabinet, and was referred to the Parliament:

    http://web.krg.org/uploads/documents/Draft%20Iraq%...

  • 5 years ago

    Rape and pillage is what befell under the Saddam regime. the U. S. is there to make confident those issues do no longer ensue in a unfastened Iraq. A vulnerable attempt at perpetuating a left-wing fable. Ain't buyin' it, dude.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    OPEC and companies that drill there will have rights to the oil. OPEC decides how much oil is going to be drilled annually, any oil producing nation that's a member of OPEC abides by their terms. And the people investing in drilling the oil have a right to say how it's going to be drilled. Iraq will make money off the oil, but have to play by certain rules in regards to oil. That's just how things work.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You should get your info from a better source - not one named 'handsoffiraqoil.' Couldn't you see the obvious bias before you even went there?

    This is not the egregious action many are making it out to be.

    http://www.economist.com/world/africa/displaystory...

    We are not going to be the only benefactors of this agreement and even if we were, we gave that country democracy and you would think that those who have been crying in their soup over the cost of that war would be glad to see some of that money being returned to our government and our economy.

    http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/1168.html

    But, no, of course not. It would mean they'd have to admit that this agreement is working out beautifully for us and the Iraqis and that Bush has done and/or isn't doing anything wrong.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Dang, it's almost as if international oil companies know what they are doing, and will use their technology and innovation to bring economic prosperity to the region.

    Economics 101 says world capitalism isn't a zero-sum game.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well, I'll let you know when we actually start taking the oil.

    So far, the prices aren't reflecting any "freebies" lately.

    That US-backed law you speak of doesn't exist, unless you can prove otherwise... no-one else seems to be able to.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    One thing is for certain that, Iraq is finished! and US will make sure and secure that, the Iraqis OIL will be managed, controlled and consumed by Americans till its last drop.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Oil should not belong to anyone.It should belong to everyone!

    Of course there should be laws to control it's use,& payment for transport,but claiming it for one's personal property is wrong,unless it is on your personal property like your backyard!

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    i think you are making a statement and think you are being subtle...you are more than obvious.

    what benefit did the average Iraqi receive under Saddam's regime? it went into his pockets for his castles and play toys, and for those of his kids ,those insane sons, who raped and pillaged, tortured and killed at will...Saddam killed thousands of his own people...and lest we forget, foreign terrorist are killing more innocents Iraqis than any one else.

    they will have more control of their oil their after war than they ever did before the war.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Man I hate questions that are too deep and technical.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.