Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Dennis H asked in EnvironmentGlobal Warming · 1 decade ago

What are the "conservative" liars like Rush Limpbough saying about global warming now?

Are they still trying to say that the world is cooling or that the world would be nice with a little more warmth? Can the FCC shut them down for comitting fraud with their anti environmental rhetoric?

13 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Exactly! So-Called "Global Warming" is a political issue, where a pseudo science is being used to 'swift boat' and muzzle political opponents.

    There is no desire to debate the science, to look for new information. Believers eyes are closed for new data. The Earth is flat they claim, and they use the UN as their church for their Inquisitions.

    This - This post is EXACTLY why "global warming" needs to be shut down, stop the funding of the politics. The science and politics is too intertwined to be objective.

  • 1 decade ago

    Actually Rush Limbaugh and the like are the ones exposing the lies about global warming. Even the founder of the Weather Channel said its a hoax. Lets see 30 years ago it was Global cooling. That was a lie. Now global warming is being proven a lie. What will they come out with next. Global moderate temperatures. Or will they go back to global cooling.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Rush is on some kick about some wind pattern in the northern hemisphere is creating a slight change in the global climate. We humans have nothing to do with it.

    He is still blaming it on the Sierra Club and Liberals who are using the issue simply for political gain.

    The FCC can do nothing as he is protected by the 1st Ammendment. Im sure Rush would say that his mad ramblings act as a "redress of greivances", using language from the Bill of Rights.

    Source(s): The Rush Limbaugh show and the Bill of Rights.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You should be asking what the skeptical scientists are saying now.

    Anthony Watts is working on improving the quality of surface stations because poorly sited stations cause a warm bias.

    http://surfacestations.org/

    Roger Pielke has said man is changing the climate but it is land use/land cover changes that are most responsible for recent warming, not CO2.

    http://climatesci.colorado.edu/2007/09/02/summary-...

    Stephen Schwartz of Brookhaven National Lab recently published a peer reviewed paper showing that climate sensitivity is not nearly as great as we once thought and will not be catastrophic.

    http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/pubs/HeatCapacity.pdf

    Roy Spencer observed a new negative feedback not known before but hypothesized by Richard Lindzen. This will change the way the GCMs run but will not increase the predictive power of the GCMs.

    http://blog.acton.org/uploads/Spencer_07GRL.pdf

    And now Craig Loehle has just published a new 2,000 year reconstruction without using tree ring data (the National Academy of Sciences has said strip bark data is not a temperature proxy and should not be used). He found that temps were 0.3C higher during the Medieval Warm Period than today.

    http://www.ncasi.org/publications/Detail.aspx?id=3...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • The United Nations' Nobel Prize-winning panel on climate change approved the final installment of its landmark report on global warming on Friday, concluding that even the best efforts at reducing CO2 levels will not be enough and that the world must also focus on adapting to "abrupt and irreversible" climate changes.

    Man can’t change what man didn’t cause

  • 1 decade ago

    Here is a good example of why the environmental movement has morphed into a religion. Anyone who questions the dogma is a heretic and should be punished for their sin. Why not have an actual debate about it?

    Also, before you go calling Rush a liar, perhaps you should listen to his show. You obviously don't. He does not deny global warming. His position is that he does not believe global warming is the result of human activity. He believes it is the result of nature and cycles.

    In truth, lots of scientists believe this. Your prophet, Al Gore, simply dismisses them out of hand, since they question his dogma. The main stream media and left wing bloggers ignore those who don't go along.

    Remember in the 1970s, is was the Al Gore types who were predicting global cooling, not the Rush Limbaugh types. They were wrong, but that seems to matter to no one.

    Source(s): The Rush Limbaugh Radio Program, broadcast everyday on over 600 radio stations coast to coast, noon to 3:00 pm eastern time. Also available at www.rushlimbaugh.com
  • 1 decade ago

    Rush is actually part of the solution, I'd say that if they taped his mouth shut for a week, the world would see an instant 25% reduction in greenhouse gas!

  • 1 decade ago

    You should watch what you say. I bet you're a democrat the racism is obvious. Did you know Al Gore's environmental movie had over 11 mistakes and its a documentary. And the same scientists that say the earth is under Global warming said it was Freezing years ago. They went from one extreme to another.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The truth

  • j2
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    NO freedom of speech you can say any B.S. you like its constitutionally protected.

    here's a thought change the station if no one listens to these TARDS then there out of job and will go away.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.