Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Would Roy Williams be better at Linebacker than Safety?

I know he would be a bit on the small side as a Linebacker, but given his strengths and weaknesses as a player I really think that would be a better position for him. He has always been more effective the closer he is to the line of scrimmage, and while his coverage skills are a liability as a safety they would be an asset as a linebacker covering slower players. Watching him struggle the past few years, I wonder why the Cowboys haven't tried this.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    No, his size just won't work. The main thing that sets a linebacker apart from a DB is being able to take on blockers. So as great of a hitter as he is, without being able to take on a guard is a major liability. You can't tackle the ball carrier if you can't get to him. And even worse, a blocker could easily push through him and use HIM to block another player.

    That's why players like Williams and Lynch cannot play linebacker. The front 7 has to be able to take on the 5 linemen + 2 blocking backs (TE & FB). After that, the SS and FS gets the tackles.

  • 1 decade ago

    I agree with you whole heartedly, anyone can get bigger, but you cant improve speed and he is one of the slower safeties in the league-and teams know it!!!

    On the other side he is a beast at the line of scrimmage. Dallas has had successful undersized LBs in the past, remember Dat Nguyen the korean nightmare! That dude was a tackling machine and his measureables pretty darn close to Roy-Roy. Williams is target in the secondary. I like Roy Williams as a safety-linebacker tweener and why not, alot of LB-DE tweeners out there. He could revolutionize the position as a safety-linebacker...they could just call his position a SACKER lol.

    He could roam and play at the line on rushing downs and out in the field on passing.

  • 1 decade ago

    In my opinion he would make a great middle linebacker. Size does play a very big part in posistion placement but raw talent and skill can overcome that. If you play him in a lot of blitzing situations and QB spys he would probably make an outstanding linebacker.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Yeah, I asked this Q a while ago, I thought He would be better as a LB, But he is small to an LB, and Not quite fast enough to be a FS, SS is probably the best place for him. He can play close to the LOS, or in the middle open feild pretty well, which seems to be his best range.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Yes he is a hard hitter and watching him gets me confused with Linebackers.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    no, he is a better safety they just need to run a different defense for him to hide his flaws

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No way he is to small running backs would plow him.

  • 1 decade ago

    As a Redskins fan, I say leave him at safety. :o)

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.