Those of you that say "let the banks fail" do you really understand?

"Those of you that say let them fail would you be ok with loosing all of your money?"

.... this statement alone shows how misinformed you are on the topic.

When these banks file BK and liquidate the BAD DEBT, it allows other banks -- who have practiced good lending standards -- to step in and buy them out. So to answer your question, I would rather have a GOOD bank buy out my BAD bank to ensure my money is protected and is kept in good hands.

You should educate yourself by learning about the Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle http://mises.org/tradcycl/austcycl.asp

..maybe THEN you will have a better idea of how and why these things NEED to happen.

I think you are too focused on the symptoms and not the causes.

Bailing out banks is a TERRIBLE idea. It inflates the currency, encourages the continuance of poor lending practices by providing a safety cushion, and the worst part is it will cost ALL of us taxpayers rendering the entire idea unconstitutional.

BTW, I'm not trying to be offensive, just being real with you. Have a nice day.

I'll answer the question by saying I generally agree with End the Fed. I have had my bank bought out about five times in the last 20 years. I would rather have it bought out again by a worthier bank than taken over by the Feds...for all the reasons outlined on the von Mises site.

That said, I would like to respond to catharsis' comment: "Money in the bank is money that the Fed can get it's hands on...Money in my pocket is out of reach for the Fed."

Catharsis, I would rethink that statement. The Fed can shrink the value of your account in an instant, just by cranking up the printing press. The lower the interest, the more money created, the less buying power each dollar has. (Dollars are no longer backed by anything but the government's blessing.) So money in your credit union may be safer from takeover, but it is not safe from the ravages of Fed monetary policy.

Money in the bank is money that the Fed can get it's hands on.

Money in my pocket is out of reach for the Fed.

Besides, I use a CREDIT UNION, not a bank. The difference being that a credit union is a NOT FOR PROFIT organization, but a bank is all about making a profit.

So, big business making a profit is pure evil and must be abolished, but the banks need to be saved? No, credit unions need to be given your open minded consideration.

I wish that we could use italics here, rather than bold font to stress key points. I honestly am not angry or trying to yell at anyone.

in case you bypass some distance adequate decrease back in human historic previous, kinfolk timber reduced in size in straightforward terms based upon earth's inhabitants. in the time of Abraham's era it extremely is predicted the completed international inhabitants grow to be someplace around 25 million vs 2 hundred million on the time of Christ. So it is not any longer problematical to think of how any significant, wealthy, blessed, and propertied individual like Abraham could be a significant impression on those alive on the time. it ought to be that only like human beings of present day circumstances savor tracing their lineage to common personages basically some hundred years in the past, the ancients had some distance much less populated kinfolk timber to study. So allot much less annoying to song traces to Abraham, David, Isaac. placed that inclusive of residing interior the comparable geographical place makes it even an much less annoying job. Now the genuine question remains, what gave the jews, muslims, and christians the wonderful to ascribe to themselves any supplies claimed to have been won by making use of Abraham from God. right it extremely is the place notion of scripture (torah, bible, quran) inserts it impression. How does one declare greater relevance than yet another? properly all of us understand the answer to that.

Hey, it's not my fault all your dang socialist is failing, it's not my fault the gov't insures banks. Let these criminals go under. Why should I have to pay more for goods because these people failed?

I guarantee you right now, you will not collect an unapportioned tax from me.

They shouldn't have raised that amount. The fund will just run out sooner.

Nonetheless, let them fail. Even if we lose everything, on an even playing field we can build it back. On an uneven, special connection driven playing field that permits international bodies to interfere in what we consider best for ourselves, we never can.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipJTqCbETog&feature...

I don't know which correspondent on MSNBC said that but there's about to be a whole ream of hell to pay for that.

You really have no clue.

Look this up FDIC.

What is it and how does it work.

I know do you

Those who say that would also stand by and watch while their houses burn down too.

They say those things because they don't truly understand economics...