Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Sara :) asked in SportsHockey · 1 decade ago

Would You Rather Retire on Top, or Continue Playing to Extend Your Records?

Do You Think It's Better to Retire on Top, or Continue Playing to Extend Your Records?

For example, Wayne Gretzky retired when he was still very good. He still had a few seasons left in him, but he retired because he wasn't playing at the level he was used to.

Or, would you like to be Gordie Howe who kept on playing until he was in his 50s?

15 Answers

Relevance
  • Favorite Answer

    Gordie Howe scored 40 points as a 52 year old (and was 40 when he first reached 100pts). Most players have trouble getting 40 points in their late 30s.

    Imagine..........Gordie Howe scores 40 points as a 52 years old..............and Derek Boogaard can play until he's 52 and still not reach 40 pts for a career!

  • 1 decade ago

    Hi

    Thought I would add this, from information I have read, Gretzky may have played as long as he could. Word is his back was in horrible shape. I think if he was going to have gone out early then he never would have played in NY. I personally would play as long as there was plenty of love for the game and I could physically keep up. I do not think any of these players that where mentioned played to extend the record, just as I doubt Brodeur will.

    Thank You

  • 1 decade ago

    Gordie Howe did not continue to play just to extend his records. If that was his motivation he would not have played in the WHA.

  • 1 decade ago

    I would probably play until I don't feel i could go on. It would have nothing to do with retiring while every team still wants me, or so i could break even more records, or make even to make them that much harder to break. I'd do it until my health stopped me.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 42
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Retire on top.

    If you're playing for the love of the game, the records don't matter anyway.

  • Snid
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    That is a dilemma. I would think I would rather play past my prime because I loved the game not just to extend records. Or, if I was still an asset to my team.

  • 1 decade ago

    I'd rather retire on top. That way when somebody eventually beats my records (and eventually, somebody would), people can still say "Yeah, but Mike retired when he was only 35. Imagine in he played another 8 years what his record would be."

  • 1 decade ago

    i would rather continue playing to extend my records....i think brodeur should just keep goin till it is physically impossible for him to play

  • Doug
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    I have the same opinion as Joe. Once the game is no longer fun, you should retire. I personally would prefer to retire on top though

  • 1 decade ago

    Extend the records, no one remembers how you played in your last few years, but no one can forget your records until they are broken.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.