Are there flaws in human logic?

In the 1930s, Austrian mathematician Godel proved a

theorem which became the "Godel theorem" in cognition

theory. It states that any formalized 'logical' system

in principle cannot be complete in itself. It means

that a statement can always be found that can be

neither disproved nor proved using the means of that

particular system. To discuss about such a statement,

one must go beyond that very logic system; otherwise

nothing but a vicious circle will result. Psychologist

say that any experience is contingent - it's opposite

is logically possible and hence should not be treated

as contradictory.

http://www.search.com/search?q=godel+incompletenes...

Flaws In Logic

The missing premise is not a flaw in logic, since logic is not concerned with the solidity of an argument but only its validity.

The flaw you point out is actually a human flaw, but not a flaw in logic itself.

I believe you are confusing an axiom w/ logical induction. The former has established a rather meaningful connection to the universe as well as humans, were as the the latter only a connection to humans. Logic will, indefinitely always be flawed in so much that it does account for the whole.

Heaven's to Betsy no! How could there logically be a logical flaw in logic, if all flaws in logic are illogical? Logic is pure, and lacking all error. :c) Not really. I truly think it depends. On what? Good question. On the premises.

Are there flaws in humans, or are there flaws in logic?

First we must ask, is there inherent truth.... far too long of a topic for here. However, if we say that there is inherent truth, then we can say that there is no flaw in logic, only flaws in humans being illogical, or committing reification.

If we are, by construct, the only "truth", which has no inherent basis, ie no truths, then is that very consideration, itself, a truth or an opinion(nihilist fallacy)?

All unanswerable questions.

The tyranny of the discontinuous mind, the idea that everything can be put into discrete groups. If the universe turns out to be a continuum rather than discrete, then any non-fuzzy system of logic is unable to accurately describe it.

If a human determines that human logic is flawed, he may thereby be flawed in his own analysis, so it doesn't mean a hill of beans.

That's basically the only reason....assumptions. The only thing that can be done is to keep them to a minimum; but we can't get rid of them.

Did you give yourself a big pat on the back for answering your own question?

It is after all called "human" logic,and therefore flawed by definition. A man without self doubt is a monster.