Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Can an employer cut your pay to transfer you to a different department?
My fiance wants to transfer to a different department at the resort he works at. His boss is telling him he can transfer, but she will cut his pay and take away is Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP.)
Is any of this legal?
He wants to transfer to get away from his ravenous ***** boss, and she will cut his pay and take his ESOP away to spite him.
7 Answers
- Anonymous10 years agoFavorite Answer
Why wouldn't it be legal? He wants to get a different job with the same company...they have the right to pay him what they would normally pay somebody in that same position. If your fiance wants to keep his salary and ESOP, he should not transfer to another position.
You work for your employer, not the other way around.
- 10 years ago
Unless he has the protection of an employment contract, the employer has authority to designate pay for each position. The employee is paid, not for being an employee, in which case the employee's salary would follow him no matter what position he took. The employee is paid to perform a job, and not all jobs are equally valued by the company.
- Chris BLv 710 years ago
Yes it is. It's his option to transfer and the company is under no obligation to make that transfer or give him what he was earning in salary and/or benefits.
- 4 years ago
specially the respond is that an company can do regardless of they p.c.. will develop, shrink in pay, hire, fire, circulate - regardless of they p.c.. yet simply by fact exertions rules are distinctive looking on what u . s . a ./province/state he works in he might p.c. to earnings the guidelines in his particular area. one element of observe: workers oftentimes are "classed". And all workers of a classification would desire to be taken care of an identical way concerning to many stuff, which incorporates advantages. And ESOP is a earnings. So if he's categorised and all workers of that classification have ESOP and he's moving to a distinctive place in that very same classification, it particularly is a difficulty for the corporate. If he's changing to a distinctive classification that's no longer eligible for advantages, then that's totally probable legal, and certainty.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.