Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What's better? To have loved and lost or to never have loved at all?
@Imgem This is the mental health section. If I wanted a lesson on English I would have posted the question in the English section.
What's better, to have loved and lost or to never have loved at all?
Better?
@Imgem This is the mental health section. If I wanted a lesson on English I would have posted the question in the English section.
What's better, to have loved and lost or to never have loved at all?
Better?
5 Answers
- imgeminirisingLv 79 years agoFavorite Answer
The expression is a statement, NOT a question...and it's self explanatory.
It IS better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all.
Of COURSE it is!
- 9 years ago
To have loved and lost. I say this because I lost my true love and if I had not known him I never really would have been truly happy. He completed my life and even though he died and I lost him I still love him and can keep living since I know that is what he would want. If I had not experienced love I don't even know where I would be.
- 9 years ago
It can be hard to lose especially if it's in a cruel way, but it's always a learning experience which makes you a better person and is why we're here so I say to have and lost.
- 9 years ago
To have loved and lost, because I would have experienced the tremendous feeling of being loved and when it's lost I become stronger.
If you never experience love, you wouldn't know what it even is!
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous9 years ago
I would say to have never loved at all cuz then u wouldnt have to suffer the disappointment of loving of losing
