If we are all god children, then isn't it incest?

yes indeed

I believe in God even though I'm an Atheist but to answer your question no it's not incest.

Fundies hate the incest questions, because they have no escape from what their bible says. If the earth was populated in the way the Christian bible says it was, then it all began with incest. The bible writers really didn't think this out very well. Now the fundies are stuck with it, and they will resort to anything, including lying, to squirm out of it.

Even if you don't believe in Adam and Eve, you still believe that all life originated from the same common ancestor. Incest still happened regardless of what you believe.

we are all the result of incest but we are not all God's children

You need not imagine incest to enjoy sex. You must insist on our ties to God to have peace and justice.

Your irrational question only begs more questions. Have you even read the Bible? No?

Your full intention is to misrepresent truth and create doubt and confusion. Because you really aren't seeking knowledge, just asking stupid stuff that's already been asked/answered a thousand times. Do you even realize, for example, that any claim that is based on an absence of evidence, by definition is a personal opinion? Did you come here to bray or ask a legitimate question? How can you be a more disgusting liar to make people work for your fun. Are you pathological? Feeling contradicted, anxious, stressed? Take your meds and go sit in the corner to be mad.

One of the more common logical fallacies used by atheists to make their arguments is equivocation.. An equivocal word is a word that has more than one meaning. The Fallacy of Equivocation occurs when an equivocal word or phrase makes an unsound argument appear sound. An extension of the Equivocation fallacy is Redefining Terms -- where you disregard the denotation of the word and redefine it to suit your position. An excellent example of this is "A Universe From Nothing" IN this Krauss does nothing but redefine the word "Nothing" to mean "Something" and then argue that Nothing (which really is something) produced the Universe.

The issue therefore is not that atheists fail to present proof, the issue is that far too often atheists present opinion as fact or belief as truth. Whether or not this is due to ignorance or deliberate deception is up to the individual to judge for himself.

Atheism is an irrational position, which is why it cannot be supported without either absurd claims, or logical fallacies.

Here is what Einstein had to say on the matter of atheism:

In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human understanding, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.

— Prince Hubertus zu Löwenstein, Towards the Further Shore (Victor Gollancz, London, 1968), p. 156; quoted in Jammer, p. 97

Einstein Archive, reel 54-927, quoted in Jammer, p. 97

I was barked at by numerous dogs who are earning their food guarding ignorance and superstition for the benefit of those who profit from it. Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is of the same kind as the intolerance of the religious fanatics and comes from the same source. They are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who—in their grudge against the traditional "opium of the people"—cannot bear the music of the spheres. The Wonder of nature does not become smaller because one cannot measure it by the standards of human moral and human aims.

— Einstein, Aug.7, 1941.

A simple lack of belief is generally passive.. One who has a lack of belief in Santa Claus does not picket and ridicule people at the mall in line with their kids to see the store santa.. Non-stamp collectors don't hang out at the post office to badmouth people buying commemorative stamps.. Non-believers in Mermaids don't bother people at cinema's who are there to see Disney's "The Little Mermaid" So if atheism is just a passive belief, why do atheists harass and attack theists? Actions speak louder than words and your actions make your words ring hollow.

Atheists would have no reason to troll in this area if they did not recognize theism as a threat... That they are here demonstrates they recognize their position is not self sustaining! If it were self sustaining it would stand on it's own without having to try tearing down other positions.

Atheists are cowards at heart and can't handle an intelligent response. Their purpose here is to spread doubt - anybody with intelligence can quickly cut through their lies, logical fallacies and reveal them for the fools they are.

Atheism, has no positive message, it not rationally tenable and your more activist atheists are rude obnoxious and annoying. Given those factors atheism is wildly successful! Most philosophies having the same attributes died out within a generation or two.

Why can't atheists figure out their ignorance does not constitute anybody else's error? Denying the evidence does not make it go away it just makes you look ignorant!

If you really want to know whether a theist or atheist is more closed-minded, one of the two approaches the evidence with an unproven exclusionary presupposition -- Atheists. That by definition is closed minded!

What is the atheists worldview?

http://plottingeoe.com/blog/what-is-the-...

Why do christians say we've never seen macro evolution?

http://plottingeoe.com/blog/never-seen-m...

Is Darwinism a pseudo-scientific version of the eastern creation myth that the earth peopled? If not, is abiogenesis replicable?

http://plottingeoe.com/blog/is-darwinism...

Evolution deniers, could i please get a list of arguments and possibly some evidence for you position?

http://plottingeoe.com/blog/evolution-deniers-coul...

Seven Evidences for a Young Earth

http://plottingeoe.com/blog/seven-evidences-for-a-...

Evolution or Creationism?

http://plottingeoe.com/blog/evolution-or-creationi...

Creationist Christians who deny Darwinian evolution?

http://plottingeoe.com/blog/creationist-christians...

no, being a child of god means you have to have the psychological maturity of a 6 year old to believe in god

Oh, look at that... another anti-theist that doesn't understand metaphors. Shocker.

I am the child of my father and mother. I am not the child of a non-existent, mythical character.