So what is easier to back up, Trump's obvious voter fraud claims evidence everywhere and 40,000 person rallies? ?

So voter fraud is not "obvious".  In fact it's the exact opposite.  It's obvious that Biden won fair and square.  There's no evidence for fraud and no reason to suspect that there would be any.  Literally the only reason you're talking about fraud is because you don't like the outcome of the election.  I understand that feeling.  Welcome to 2016.  It sucks.  But claiming fraud because you lost is wrong.  Someone's got to lose each election.  This time it was your turn. 

As for the idea that rallies are predictive of overall voting, that's pretty silly.  To start with, Biden's rallies had low attendance because he didn't seek large numbers.  Unlike Trump, Biden took coronavirus seriously from the beginning.  He realized that holding traditional large in person rallies was dangerous.  So he cancelled them.  The in person events he did hold were mostly small venue events with just a handful of people.  He also did some drive in rallies which had more people but still not the thousands which you normally see at rallies.  Trump didn't take corona seriously ever and he doesn't care about his supporters' lives and health so he continued to hold pre-pandemic style rallies.  These rallies ended up, by one estimate, killing 700 people.  But they didn't mean that Trump was going to win.  After all, even the largest in person rally is only a tiny tiny fraction of the people who will cast ballots.  There were over 160 million people who voted in 2020.  So a 40,000 person rally, such as you talk about 0.02% of all ballots cast.  It's statistically meaningless.  We can also see real world evidence of this in the 2016 election, which even Trump doesn't dispute the accuracy of.  Trump held large rallies there, which by your logic means he should have won.  But Trump lost the 2016 election, at least in terms of the popular vote, which is what rally attendance would supposedly be indicative of.  He got three million fewer votes than Clinton and got just 46% of the vote overall.  That right there shows you how little correlation there is between rally attendance and overall popularity. 

What's actually crazy is to think that Trump would win.  I mean what on earth would ever make you think that?  The man is incredibly unpopular.  He's one of the least popular presidents in American history.  He got only 46% of the vote in his first election.  That's not only less than his opponent, it's less than any other Democrat or Republican this century.  He got just half a percent more than Michael Dukakis, a guy whose name is basically synonymous with "presidential loser:"  One he became President things weren't much better.  In fact, they were usually worse.  Trump holds the unique distinction of being the only president in the history of opinion polling to have never had 50% or more approval during his presidency.  Not once.  Throughout almost all of his presidency his approval rating was below, sometimes way below, his 2016 vote share.  In 2016, literally every national poll showed Trump losing to Biden, some by margins as high as 10 percent.  So why on earth would you ever think that this guy was going to win, let alone that he was some kind of unstoppable juggernaut who couldn't possibly lose?  I mean how could any adult be that disconnected from reality? 

Was third grade the best five years of your life?

Eric David Coomer, Vice President and Director of Strategy & Security at Dominion Voting Systems said on an Antifa chat that he made ******* sure Trump wouldn't win. That sounds like a confession to me. When it came to his hatred for Trump and Trump voters he was very public and stupid about it. 12 days before the election Eric David Coomer had the voting machines "updated" via USB which is exactly how U.S. Army Colonel and Cyber Warfare Specialist Phil Waldron who is an expert on automated voting machines said these machines can be corrupted. Coomer claimed the change was "minor" and did not require recertification. Nothing to see here, right? 

You're a child yourself dumbass 

I have not met one person who voted for Trump.

Your rant is gibberish.

K. Good .  See ya later 

LMFAO! Typical Trumpturd logic! Let me spell it out for you: Liberals believe in science/take COVID seriously, and aren't dumb @sses that crowd together during a pandemic.

Liberals are unable to read and understand what you said.

I know this is really hard to believe but here we go. People exist outside Trumps Hitler Ego rallies. The real silent majority is tired of Trump.

Lets explain this so a Trump supporter can understand. We are in a pandemic. Most non Trumpers know to avoid big rallies and to social distance. We also had record amounts of a mail-in ballots. Again due to the pandemic. Hillary had 66 million votes just 4 years ago. Why is it so hard to believe Biden had 80 million? Trump had 73 million. Oh wait all of his votes are legit of course to the Trump supporter mind.

Seriously why ask a question that is going to make you so angry when reading the responses?