EvilOrangeDirtBag

if life was found on other planets, how would you as a Christian react?

ever get a bhoner?

prefer to show up on white bread or whole wheat toast?

didn't have sex, did he masturbate or just have wet dreams? After all Christians say he was fully human and doubt that there ever was a human that didn't have a wet dream.

that God has both a penis and a vagina?

Genesis 1:25-27 Humans were created after the other animals.

Genesis 2:18-19 Humans were created before the other animals.

Genesis 1:27 The first man and woman were created simultaneously.

Genesis 2:18-22 The man was created first, then the animals, then the woman from the man's rib.

They can't both logically be true.

Genesis 1:25-27 Humans were created after the other animals.

Genesis 2:18-19 Humans were created before the other animals.

Genesis 1:27 The first man and woman were created simultaneously.

Genesis 2:18-22 The man was created first, then the animals, then the woman from the man's rib.

They can't both logically be true.

that is going to happen, then why even bother with creation and history? What's the point? Why didn't he just put the people who he already knew would be in Heaven in Heaven those evil people in Hell?

then he is ultimately responsible for evil, since evil cannot exist without him intending it and creating a world that it is possible in. If he is not responsible for evil then he did not create evil itself and therefore did not create everything and therefore not God. So which is it?

and lifetime healthcare?

My vote goes to Beck since it takes a big d*o*u*c*h*e bag to pretend cry on TV.

After all you guys are the ones that say regulation is a bad thing. So I am real curious how you back peddle and spin your position on regulation. Go ahead, this should be enlightening.

Can the Republican Party really become more inclusive when its white Evangelical/Business masters are calling the shots? Telling everybody they must believe in what they believe in and that they should be allowed to enrich themselves at the cost of the average working American? Is it possible for the Republicans to be the majority in politicos again without going beyond their very narrow focus on “family values” and breaks for big business and the rich?

filled with violence and hatred? Why is it that eastern religions such as Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, Confucianism, Taoism, etc have no trouble getting along with each other?

Doesn't he have the power to do something about it? And if he does and he let's it persist then it means that he planned it this way (he actually had to plan it because he knew that evil would infect his creation before he created it). And so if God planned evil (otherwise evil happened without God’s intentions, which would make him NOT God) it must be an important part of his creation otherwise he would or never created Satan and allowed him to corrupt Adam and Eve. SO HOW CAN GOD BE OPPOSED TO EVIL WHEN HE PURPOSELY CREATED A CREATION IN WHICH HE KNEW EVIL WOULD HAPPEN AND DOES NOTHING TO DESTROY IT WHEN HE HAS THE POWER TO DO SO AT ANY MOMENT? Is it the in reality evil is part of God's plan? Taking into account all that was stated above, can anyone explain to me how evil is not part of God's plan?

Isn't this the same argument Christians use for believing in Jesus and God? That he can't be disproved? So does that mean I should believe in Big Foot, Aliens, Loch ness monster, moth man, the Jersey Devil too? These have many eye witness too and these people, in contrast to the Bible, are alive today and can be verified. So if you believe the eye witness testimony in the Bible, how can you RATIONALLY deny the eyewitness of the phenomena listed above? (unless you have already decided you WANT to believe in Jesus and not Big Foot) This makes Big Foot and the other stories listed on par with the Bible claims of the supernatural; eyewitnesses but no physical proof. After all, that is why Christians say to have faith, because there is no physical proof for Jesus or God. So can anyone tell why believing in Big Foot with the available evidence is any different than believing in Jesus and God with the available evidence?

From what I gather, Senator Obama, in his appeal to evangelicals, mentioned the Book of Leviticus, which says (among other things) that slavery's okay but eating oysters isn't. My buddy James Dobson claims Obama's twisting these Old Testament writings that (in his words) "don't apply anymore" with the words of Jesus.

The most common passage used by evangelicals in Leviticus is 18.22: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind; it is an abomination." Leviticus is an Old Testament writing...did James Dobson just say the Old Testament prohibition against homosexuality doesn't apply anymore? I think he did.

Who else finds this type of cherry picking by many Christians mind boggling? Highlighting everything in the Bible that supports their own argument while ignoring or make excuses for what contradicts them. Is this hypocrisy at it’s most audacious or just a result of a rigid self delusional mind?

Who was surprised by the description of the Bush Administration in McLellans’ book as:

1) Deceptive

2) Self deceptive

3) Incompetent

4) Over confident

5) Arrogant

6) Stubborn

Didn’t most of the world already know this?

In fact Satan kills no one while God slaughters multitudes. Why is it God that is blood thirsty and vengeful?