scrapiron.geo

I was watching an interview with a black man who disagreed with the Liberal positions about issues concerning race.  The rebuttal person, a black woman, responded that he was married to a white woman, wanted to be white, and wanted a colorless society.  She said this as if it was a negative thing.  Isn’t that what we should strive for, a society where color doesn’t matter at all?  So when did Martin Luther Kong’s words, “not judged by the color of their skin” become a negative?

I mean relationships in general just aren't that important in my life. I don't feel a need to seek my old friends out, etc.

In fact, the primary drivers of the rise in US supply(which led to lower prices) were the increase in drilling and fracking, both of which were heavily opposed by the Democrats. The mocked the push for drilling("Drill, baby drill") and claimed that it would make no difference in prices. Private drilling rose 61% since 2009 while federal oild drilling fell 6%. Improved drilling techniques and fracking improved the yields of wells(and revitalized some older ones), and the Democrats were very much against both. So how can they claim any credit for something that is an effect of the very things they opposed?

First eliminate the differentiation of income source, wages, capital gains, stock gains are all one category INCOME. Next, below 1.5x the poverty level(~$35k for a family of 4), no taxes are owed, period. The lowest wage workers get the gross amount of their wages(increasing their available income). After that, taxes are collected on all income types and sources at 33%(average rate for all taxpayers in the range of over $35k). Maybe a standard deduction could be allowed. Also, that would be the entire code. Your tax form would basically be 6 lines: income total, standard deduction, income-deduction, result *0.33, payments, taxes-payments. Its a win-win the rich pay less(like they want) and the poor get more of the money they earn(helping them), plus the IRS could be shrunk.

What I mean is it probable that whites perceive less racism than actually exists and some minorities see more than actually exists?

Presumably if they had a paper trail, we would have caught them before now. So how do they prove they have been here long enough to qualify? And if they can't should we go ahead and deport them?

Or is it that it is easier to slip things past people who are distracted by how big their hands are or searching for the Doritos?

Seriously, if he gets a bill that makes it a full on criminal offense, denies ANY path to citizenship permanently, and calls for deportation of all illegal immigrants regardles of time spent here or economic contribution, will he sign it?

Say I robbed a bank over 5 years ago, but I stayed around and spent the money here, having an economic impact. Should I be allowed to stay out of jail(the penalty for breaking the law) because it happened in the past and I had a good economic impact?

We only care that they BROKE THE LAW. They are by definition criminals, and should be treated as such. INS should be there in Vegas to deport the girl he talked about and arrest him for hiring an illegal alien.

We want to deport their brats right along with the rest of them. We want the WHOLE Illegal fam,ily sent back to where they came from. Glad I could clear that up for you.

Those filthy poutine eaters need to stay north of the border.

They don't work high skill jobs, they work low skill jobs. shouldn't those be occupied by poor Americans, rather than those who came here illegally?

I am not for an amnesty order, but I have seen people on here talking about impeaching Obama if he issues one. So if he used the words "pardon for their violations of immigration law", would an impeachment have a leg to stand on?

The graphs show that the various minorities and age groups turned out in % comparable to the Presidential elction years(which average better turnout than midterms). Are Liberals still going to claim voter suppression, despite numbers not supporting that?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014...

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/both-republica...

Thw first graphs shows that the Democrats in Congress are nearly 5 years old on average than the Republicans. In addition the oldest Senator at the Moment is Democrat Feinstein at 81. Out of the eldest 20, it isj 10R-9D-1I(or 10-10 if you count Sanders(I) as a Dem).

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/11/18-year-ol...

The only way she could prove it more wrong is if she was black.