rladlof

http://www.alternet.org/story/154575/why_are_all_t...

Vote . . . What is it about pasty-arsed Rapturian chicken-hawks that they crave/pretend to be persecuted? Why do Christofascists believe the only way they can be like the Hebrew idol they pretend to worship (but avoid following) is to imagine imaginary folk are attacking their imaginary positions? Why are they only holy in pseudo victimhood? Inquiring minds want to know.

Sociopathic anarchist who has spent the last quarter of a century attempting to destroy the Federal government by cashing one paycheck after another wholly unacceptable? Where does their fervor arise from?

Spermin' Herman has suspended his campaign for a show on FAUX Noise . . . Oops! Sorry . . . The Presidency?

Newt Gringrich's American Solutions was served with eviction papers by the owner of K Street offices yesterday; is it time for American to do the same to him directly?

Inquiring minds wanna know . . .

Obama is asking for an increase in this tax-break, will Re/TEApublicans flok to support our Great Nation's President?

The largest applause line at the Republican candidate mass debate held by NBC at the Saint Rawndawg Raygun LIE-brary was the question noting that Governor Perry personally whacking over 200 folk including known innocent people.

The largest applause line at the TEAbagger/CNN Republican candidate mass debate was Representative Paul leading the room to the conclusion that folk sick folk should just get about shuffling off the mortal coil and to prove his point he could point to whacking his 2008 Campaign Manager of his Presidential campaign through canceling his insurance.

August 2011 job numbers looked to increase by a mere 17K as the stimulus peters out, THEN the Minnesota Republican lead legislative branch forced a government shutdown which resulted in the furloughing of 17K teachers:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/sep/2/job...

Please review: http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=... if you require additional information.

Elisabeth Claira Heath Sladen (b. February 1, 1948 – d. April 19, 2011)

. . . to be “liberal Democrats” before spewing their pre-Dickensian claptrap? Given that most progressive radio hosts invite dissent and varying views, wouldn't it be less undermining of their opinion to enter the conversation without opening with an intentional fabrication? This question is > > > NOT < < < about the worthiness of ‘Progress Talk’ or its message; it is about discussing the attempt to convince through premeditated covert dishonesty. Again, the inquiry is not about defending/disparaging ‘Progressive Talk’ radio; it was about folk entering into a public conversation through willful and intentional lies and moral malfeasance. I want to understand why recessivists insist on intentionally and knowingly arguing from a position of compromised integrity. It is my fervent desire that folk address that issue. Please focus on/discuss the right-wing callers approach to SPAMming ‘Progressive Talk’ Shows.

- - - -

SIDE NOTE - Additional Information:

Sooth be typed, I have nothing against individuals holding recessivist opinions. I like having folk to discuss diverging ideas with to sharpen my understanding of our fact-based reality. Heck if it weren't for historical illiteracy and piss-poor rhetorical skills there would be no Republicans/Libertarians/Objectivists. I do not care, at this moment, if you think that living in 1860 would be totally Smurfy.

SIDE NOTE - Additional Information 2:

Progressive Talkers now make up 3 to the Top Ten Talkers (up from 1 over the last 5 years): http://www.talkers.com/2011hhindex.html

Corporate media outlets tend towards attempting to deliver a message that supports their interests. There is a plethora of data to show that markets where progress media is allowed to be broadcast, it is very competitive and often overshadows the market share of the big five Right Talkers. If the corporate media outlets in your area avoids broadcasting Progressive Talkers, I suggest that you consider streaming 1150AM KTLK from Los Angeles or 620AM KPOJ from Oregon OR consider podcasting Thom Hartmann or Stephanie Miller or even Randi Rhodes in the short run. The message may not be your cup of tea and you may choose to avoid it thereafter.

Dickensian claptrap? Given that most Progressive radio hosts invite dissent and varying views, wouldn't it be less undermining of their opinion?

The Party of NO and Nothing Else says that they wanna scrap Obamacare BUT in their Pledge to put a Contract ON America, Part Deux, says they want to enact all the provissions that went into effect TODAY . . . Is this stupidity or are they huffing glue (or do they have such a low opinion of the American electorate that they can't even grok how belittling to their base their false postering is to Americans)?