David

Remember how Obama and all of the Democrats were crying all to heaven about how the "Bush tax cuts" were for the WEALTHY only? Remember that?? Well if they were for the WEALTHY ONLY then how the h*ll did keeping those tax cuts benefit the middle class, then?? I guess the Bush tax cuts WEREN'T JUST FOR THE WEALTHY AFTER ALL, huh?

At last night's State of the Union speech, President Obama said that he was going to make JOBS his focus for 2010. Isn't he a year late?

Why do you suppose he speaks and speaks and speaks instead of working?

(I know that he's speaking today about verterans, and that's good (depending on what he actually SAYS) but generally, he's on TV like EVERY day - when does this guy do any WORK?)

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/charl...

Try www.Google.com

and then look

at www.Bing.com

It reads faster than it looks like it would... here it is:

BARRY SOETORO aka BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

IS A

USURPER

He is not eligible to be

President of the United States

because he is not a Natural Born Citizen

as required by Article Two, Section One, Clause Five of the United States Constitution.

This is a fact REGARDLESS of

where he was born (Mombasa, Hawaii, Chicago, Mecca or Mars).

He is not eligible

because he was not born of

TWO PARENTS

BOTH OF WHOM WERE UNITED STATES CITIZENS

AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH

as required by the Constitution.

His father, who did not live in the United States for more than a couple of years, was a subject/citizen

of Kenya/Great Britain at the time of Barack’s birth and afterwards, AND further, as Barack himself admitted on his website during the 2008 campaign, Barack was therefore born SUBJECT TO THE GOVERNANCE OF GREAT BRITAIN.

Here is a direct quote from Obama's "Fight the Smears/Fact Check" 2008 website:

‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “

The FACT that he was not born of TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS is all that matters. The question of his birth certificate is a distraction (a distraction fostered by Obama’s supporters?) that ought not to occupy our time and resources.

Also, it is possible that he is not a United States

citizen at all through his mother if he was born in Kenya, as three witnesses have testified. The reason is because his mother could not pass her US citizenship on to her son because she did not live continuously in the United States for five full years after her fourteenth birthday as required by the US immigration law in effect during that period of time.

His usurpation can only be corrected (1) by Congress through his Impeachment and Removal [something which will never happen in a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid], or (2) it can be

corrected by his resignation, which could happen if the public pressure on him to resign becomes great enough, or (3) by his removal by the United States Supreme Court affirming a Quo Warranto decision of the United States Federal District Court for the District of Columbia [which process Attorney General Eric Holder would never allow to even begin] or (4) by an amendment to the Constitution,

which will never happen because that again would require the agreement of a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid.

_

HERE IS THE QUESTION WHICH EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD BE ASKING HIS OR HER CONGRESSMAN AND SENATORS

“During the 2008 election, then Senator Obama published a statement at his website which said that his birth status was ‘governed’ by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell me, and the American people, how a person governed - at birth - by British law, can be a natural born citizen of the United States and thus constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States?”

---

- Leo Rugiens

He & almost everyone on his show (and on MSNBC in general) are calling the protesters "tea baggers". They KNOW that this isn't what the protesters have named their events. They KNOW that the term that they are using has undesirable overtones. How insulting and childish on their part. And don't get me started on Jeanine Garafalo (sp?) and her insults and claims that the protesters are simply "racist" & "tea bagging rednecks"...

He was specifically invited by the President of France (as if the President of the USA needs the urge of an invitation) to visit this location where thousands of U.S. soldiers who made the supreme sacrifice for freedom lie. I understand that the White House later indicated that BHO "didn't want to offend the German leader"?? (If that is true - isn't that the most ridiculous thing you've ever heard? ...so he most certainly offends Americans & our heroes instead?!)

According to the article from the Breitbart.com ( http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979CMGO0&... ) looks like MORE TAX PROBLEMS for Obama & crew. And these are the "best" he can find for the leaders of our Nation?? (Though I'll concur that the tax errors represented in the article are not that aggregious - given this country's eff'd up tax code).

Wal-mart is opening a couple of Hispanic-oriented stores in Houston, TX, USA and Phoenix, AZ, USA. What do you think?

where "separation of church and state" is written?

as Obama's (Second? Third?) Health Secretary nominee?? UUUUughh! She's soo despicable! My stomach just FELL when I read this. She's so pro-abortion it is literally sickening.

of Iraq by 2011? Why is Barack H.O. talking like he's "all over it" when this idea is old news?

I put my resume online and was contacted out of thin air from Aflac. I have a lot of professional experience and I'm good with people but have no sales experience. I wasn't impressed with the offices or location for this "professional, high-dollar compensation" organization, however. I was asked to return for a second interview this week with a decision on if I would like to work for them. Any feed back would be appreciated.

Why is it that those who so strongly support EVOLUTION (Darwinism, "survival of the fittest") are the first one's on the bandwagon to thwart THAT VERY THING when it comes to the banks or mortgage or insurance companies? Why do they 'demand' that these entities be ARTIFICIALLY supported instead of allowed to 'evolve' away - since they're apparently NOT up to the task?

What we have in Democratically-controlled Washington right now is SURVIVAL of the UNFITTEST. The exact opposite of what they support!

See this article on Yahoo about examples of good intentions NOT coming out as planned:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090125/ap_on_re_as/ch...

I don't mean to seem unseemly but you have to admit it's pretty crazy timing for her to pass away on the EVE of the election. Almost oracle like.

I repeat, "WTF are these D*MN Yahoo "Coffee Breaks"?!?!?"

Barack Obama just said on LIVE TV that he said "not so fast" to the $700 Billion dollar bail-out. Didn't Harry Reid claim these past few days that it was McCain that came in and "ruined" the talks??

Doesn't this make Harry Reid a pompous, lying, *ss?

president@whitehouse.gov

Tell them how you feel about this fiscal irresponsibility on the part of the government.