Girls kissing girls / Guys kissing guys - the same?

I see no difference, and I don't think women are any more prone to be bisexual than men. Currently mores are just more willing to accept it. Man and man experimentation happens just as often...except it happens behind closed doors, not on the dance floor of a nightclub.

I say it's better. The girls I've kissed, were way better than the guys. They know exactly what turns a girl on. Like, the last girl I kissed was about the cutest kisser ever. She would play with my hair, kiss my nose, bite my lip, cute things like that. We were in the movies, laughing and kissing at the same time. Just don't be awkward, or afraid to do anything. It makes it more fun. For me, it's just more awkward with a guy. It's like, girls and girls connect better than girls and guys. That's why I think girl/girl kissing is better.

Umm rastagrappler, you are straight so you will obvious find women sexier. Just being friends doesn't mean you aren't homophobic, that could just mean you are politically correct or trying to be. But anywhoo, prettiness does not make having sex any easier. You are confusing attractive to sexually attractive, good looking and good looking in the sexual way. They are two different things.

You might be surprised with how beautiful gay men find women. Hell some gay men say other women are sexy or hot, yet they are just as repelled with having sex with a woman as a straight man is towards another man. Certainly gay men should naturally be attracted and it should be normal too right? Think of it this way. You have a cousin or family member (woman) that is very pretty, beautiful. You are probably think, well duh, that;s family. But while that is obvious, the reason I point this out is showing the difference between attractive and sexually attractive. You see by the family example, you can find one pretty, yet repulsive with the thought in the sexual attractive sense?

The reason is because for other examples, you can find a person very beautifulm but be just as repulsed by the thought of sex with someone regardless, thereforem attractive in one sense, yet not attracitve in the other sense. It doesn't matter how pretty one is, you have to be born or have some sexual attraction. Beatufy doesn;'t make it easier to do something sexual. Because no matter how pretty, if not sexually attracted, a person will be repelled or not interested in sex with that person or sex. Whereas anotehr person might not be anything special, but the though of having sex not being repelled or there being interested, because of naturally have a sexual attraction to a person or sex.

You have to be sexually attracted first, then the beauty difference is what can make the difference in provoking one's sexual interest to one person compared to another. Withouth out the born, or latent sexual attraction, it wouldn;t matter how beatiful a person is or wouldn;t make it any easier. Beauty only makes a difference with it being easier to have sex with the same sex if there is sexual attraction there to begin with.

There's no difference, just guys get made fun of more, and harsher about a guy-guy kiss

Are you being serious or is this a trolling question. It's definitely not the same - society sees girl-girl kissing as much more acceptable and advertising and the media seem to encourage it. It's hip and fashionable. If a guy kissed another guy on tv, they'd pretty much be finished.

Alex

The stereotype of 'guy on guy' is a bit more of a stigma than 'girl on girl'.

Guys have been raised to believe that homosexual contact makes them 'less than a man'. Furthermore, even admitting to having such thoughts is considered weak and effeminate.

Personally, I would much rather kiss a girl. They are softer. However...I like guys, too. For other reasons....

I think it's the same and when growing up playing those games we treated it as the same...

But maybe I just have been blessed with particularly open-minded friends lol.

I don't know, perhaps girls see it differently or maybe how some are brought up or maybe just have bi tendencies. But the girls I know wouldn't kiss in a sexual way to another girl. If it's just like a little peck, then that's just something usual for girls as I see women kiss each other on the cheek when greeting. But I have seen some who are brought up differently perhaps or attracted to girls and have no problem kissing girls. All I know is that I wouldn't. But the reason isn't simple because of being repelled, but my rationalizing is just like a ying and yang thing. I'm probably just rationalizing how I'm programmed, but I can tell and am secure enough in my sexuality to tell if a guy is better looking than me or if one looks like a model or whatver being handsome and who looks like clown.

But definitely not sexual, but that just pure objective recognition and repelled of the thought of ever kissing a dude. The reason being is because I'm attracted to femininity, the curves and skin, and just about everythng that is female. And I'm not talking about boobs, pussy and ***, like some guys would state, because tranny's can have breasts for crying out loud and can have womanly bodies, but there faces, even if feminine still look like a guy. So it's the hair, the soft feminie feautes and face and such and grace and just about everything from the smell, the way a woman walks and eveythjng and not just body parts, but woman as in the whole presence that I love and am attracted to. A feminine man or prety man, while not rugged is still a man and still naturally has the "opposite" featrures that I'm attracted to, the chiseled features and masculine face, therefore, being repelled, because not being attracted at all to that, because it is the complete opposite of what I'm attracted to, therefore, not attracted to at all.

I used to wonder about that with women being pretty, but family and woman I know that aren;'t attracted, I assumend must have looked at it in reverese. While women finding women pretty, ojectively attractie and sexually attractive beign two different things. Which makes sense, considering gay men find women quite beautiful, but they are just as intertested in having sex or doing anything sexual with a woman as a straight man is towards another man, which is obviously not at all. So I assumed the attraction for women to men was the masculine, chiseled features, thereforem not being interested in the opposite. I guess women aren't programmed like that? Do women have a sexual orientation or just a mere preference? The stigma also might be related to that I guess as some have said.

Perhaps it's more culture than I even realize, as I read that in Italy or other cultures and in the past, a man greeating another man with a kiss was not seen as gay but a way of greeting another friend. So perhaps cultural conditioning might be a big part of it. But if we are talking about something more than a little peck, and more like french kissing, then that would seem like bisexual tendencies to me.

Edit to Wildraft: It's pretty simple, "Wilddraft is ugly and I'm not. Go speak for yourself **** face! I didn't mean to be a jerk, but this is the billionth time now that I have heard this and it boggles my mind. What is wrong? Why are you so homophobic and insecure to say that. I guess women must be screwed up in the head to find you attractive huh? Or must be weirdos for being attracted and finding you more attractive than women even though nature programmed straight women to be. I'm sorry, but I have no idea why a man does not like or would not want to be considered good looking by women and his body admired or doesn't feel that way about himself. I'm sorry but many girls have found my quite handsome as well as the body and it's good because I don't know how fun sex would be if women found men ugly and knowing that they feel that way about a man's body/looks. If men are not goodlooking, then that means that you aren;t so don't start this delusional bullshit, thinking you are the exception. I would like to believe I'm the best looking guy but I know that is not true.

So I'm pretty sure this will apply to you with probably even more men being better looking (yeah, I know I'm being a jerk but I don't care, since you deserve it). So if many men are better looking than you, then that means you definitely aren't good looking or must be ugly then, because that's how it would logically go with your insecure brainwashed thinking.

The idea of kissing is just a cultural thing.

I would definitely let a guy punch me square in the face before I would kiss one. And I don't consider myself homophobic, either. I am perfectly comfortable spending time around gay men, and do not become threatened or uptight on the rare occasions that a gay guy has hit on me. But the idea of kissing a guy is among the most disgusting things I can think of.

Women are clearly more prone to bisexual behavior. I think it is natural. Women are sexier than men--they are the giver's of life. The highest aspect of the divine is the feminine aspect. That is not to say that women are "better" than men, or more qualified to lead or whatever. But I can understand why they would not mind kissing each other. But no guy would kiss another guy unless he was sexually attracted to men, or at least making some money off the situation.