Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is this GREAT news? Bringing the Tasmanian Tiger back from Extinction...?

Here is the link:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080520/sc_...

Do you feel that this is unethical?

Are you excited by the potential of bringing back just RECENT extinct species (like the Dodo Bird and the Tasmanian Tiger)

or

Interested in also including bringing back such Pre-Historic animals like the Wooley Mammoth, Saber-Toothed Tiger, or larger reptiles such as the Pterodactyl ?

I'm of the Creationist / Intelligent Design perspective, and I would LOVE to entertain bringing "back" many of the extinct species - recent and pre-historic.

Do you feel the same way, or are there very serious Ethical issues to consider? If so, please present your arguement / perspective.

*** I posted this also under SCIENCE/MATHEMATICS - ZOOLOGY, but also wanted to hear direct perspective of those who are of the Pro or Anti Religious views ****

052108 9:50

Update 2:

Multitude articles & links below.

http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news;_ylt=A0WT...

Hoping that SOMETHING works!!!

11 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Link doesn't work....

    I can't help but to want to try to bring back recently extinct animals.

    But this is on a continum with all kinds of genetic engineering. I am uncomfortable with the "frankenfoods" they are creating by slicing pig DNA into tomatoes, for example.

    I can't help but to think that re-created extinct animals will be flawed somehow. The first ones will not be raised by their natural mother, for one thing. So they will not be socialized properly. Almost all mammals and birds get socialized into their societies.

    I think that nature has a wisdom that humans shouldn't tamper with. Perhaps it's way to late, we started tampering back with the invention of agriculture. And agriculture is not the big advance it's made out to be, it brought class society, poverty, disease, ecological disruption.*

    So I have mixed feelings about this. I would solve the problems of the world through a drastic decrease in human population** and a return to more nature-friendly systems. But the world does not seem to be going that way.

    Ah...!

    Source(s): *"Against the Grain: How Agriculture Has Hijacked Civilization" by Richard Manning **http://www.vhemt.org/
  • CH
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Yeah I don't have a problem with it if it's anything like the same methodology being considered to save the northern white rhino from going extinct. As for the prehistoric animals, if there is an ecosystem available that will support their needs and if their presence is not a negative thing for other people or animals then I suppose it's fine.

    The only thing I'd say is that if the process required to create healthy animals necessitates "mistakes" that create animals that are miserable due to defects etc. then it would be unethical. But if the animal welfare issues (not just of the creature being bred) are taken into account at all stages then I think it's fine.

  • I'm all for it, I've always wanted to see a Do Do bird. Mel Blank used to have them as cartoons on the Luny Tunes. They are very interesting and entertaining birds. They are like the comic relief of the animal kingdom.

    Source(s): Atheist
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I'm very exited about it. I saw the video about the Tazmanian tiger a couple of days ago. I think its awesome . Many of these animals desapered bacause of human actions, so i think its right to bring them back to live.

    I consider myself a religious person and i dont think its wrong, i think scientists are doing the right thing, even if they try to bring the dinasours back to live.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    I would support saving any species. As for bring back extinct species, you have to do that very carefully. As someone who accepts science (evolution) I know that introducing new species can alter an environment and cause more harm then good.

  • 1 decade ago

    I think when humans destroy a species, they reduce the genetic legacy of the planet.

    So if we can restore some species we destroyed, that could be a good thing, yes.

    As others have pointed out, it would have to be done only after due consideration.

  • 1 decade ago

    I think it kind of cool to bring back a extinct animal, Yea i read that same article not to long ago. as long as they keep those animals in a safe. and dont let any out. I know we shouldnt play God, that sense it wrong but it could us one day.

  • it is a double edged sword,where do,s it stop. Bringing back ancient forms of humans. AM all in favour, of bring back some extinct forms. We just have to be careful

  • 1 decade ago

    Yes!!! I can't wait to see how a Tasmanian Tiger taste on the grill.

  • 1 decade ago

    You posted a bad link but yeah, that'd be awesome

    Source(s): reality perspective
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.