Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Isn't it time to define life in terms of substantive viability?

I don't think we can go backwards now after Roe V. Wade and define life as starting at conception - even though technically it probably does. But we have to do something about partial birth abortion or anything close to inhumane treatment of innocent victims. I think it's time to introduce a serious idea like substantive viability - anything with a heartbeat. The heartbeat defines life more than anything and the lack thereof - death. That leaves room for prevention and termination up to a point that I think most people can agree is even humane or semi-acceptable. I'm pro life but I think we need to find common ground stop keep it from being such a politically hot issue. Even if new pro life supreme court justices are selected - I think they should bring this idea into the decision process. Any thoughts?

Update:

Substantive viability would be separate and distinct from "independent viability" - which is a different issue really, if you look at anyone on short term life support - they still have all rights afforded to a living human. I'm trying to get at a humane cut off that stops the termination of life with a beating heart, which to me is inhumane.

2 Answers

Relevance
  • Gravy
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Viability is considered the cut-off for an abortion.

    There has already been a ban enacted on "partial birth" abortions in the US, which the Supreme Court upheld 5-4.

    I'm pro-choice, but believe that life begins at conception. As long as there are cells dividing and differentiating, it's ludicrous to reason that it's anything else. I just don't think a blob without so much as a nervous system is quite comparable to a fully-formed human being.

  • 1 decade ago

    On one hand, I agree with you that the root cause of the abortion debate is a definitional disagreement. How do you define life and when life begins.

    On the other hand, I don't agree with you that a heart beat means "substantive viability". A baby has a heart beat long before it is "viable" - that is to say can live relatively unassisted. So, now we have another definitional problem...

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.