Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What is Grappling...?
DO NOT ASSUME THAT I DO NOT KNOW WHAT GRAPPLING IS!
I am addressing this question to the generation that grew up in the MMA era we are in.
Senior Level guys, please hold off until we've had a few "young minds" answers.
And please - do not just leave one word answers - give us details of your take on grappling.
I will give mine later.
Be advised - I will not be giving anyone "thumbs down" for their answers.
Not all, but some responses evoke me to ask why do most of these guys advise people to train in grappling when they can't even define it?
I'd like some input from Senior Level Practitioners. Let's expel the myths.
Sev - I am not asking this to then answer it. I'm asking. You define it.
Great answer by Lion Dancer... hey I made a rhyme! I'm a poet and I don't even know it! I've got more pitches than the utility company's got switches! Man, I'm on a roll so don't be a troll!
Those of the MMA generation believe that grappling is ground fighting.
The opposite is correct - ground fighting is grappling, but, and there is a BUT - ground fighting is only a percentage of grappling.
They way they believe it, I equate it to someone who says he or she can cook, but can only roast marshmallows or boil eggs to make egg salad. That is only PART of cooking. They are leaving out the rest.
And that is what BJJ has done. It has made up its own definition of grappling.
Grappling involves other things that they do not know of, because they follow the wrong definition of grappling.
They believe that well rounded means using a percentage of grappling and a percentage of striking.
Funny thing about it is that they love Bruce Lee but they fail to adhere to one of his most popular lines: "don't concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory."
It's no surprise, he ignored it too!
Excellent answers by JW, Samurai Chef and Master Pugpaws.. outstanding!
Always a white belt and Drunior - great answers! You have earn my respect.
Really, many of the answers here define grappling.
Yes, Drunior - the purpose of my question is to hopefully awaken something in those who place limits on themselves that are influenced by people who have a financial interest in keeping younger generations convinced of half-truths.
@Chef - the etymology of the term Grapple is "hook". It comes from a word that means hook.
I hope this serves as a perspective to the misinformed so that they can gain in knowledge and not sound like they are just parroting what the industry is saying.
People should always endeavor to learn - discover new things and not locking yourself into limited methods or half-truths. .
Zen Master, and Matsubayashi Ryu Master, Zenko Heshiki, described the term "kara" of karate as not merely "empty", but - void, or expansion - vastness.
This is why Karate has the distinction of having unlimited application for every movement, positive and negative, transition to transition and everything in between. It is not a striking art and it is not kick, block, punch.
This young generation is going to carry on the teachings. Do you guys want to preserve something that has made history? Or do you want to continue the behavior that has caused precious treasures to disappea
AGAIN! I do not want to present ONE defining statement that answers this question. I merely want to gather all sides so that a clearer measurement can be made. Looking at both sides of this argument, it can be seen that one side is based on years of history and experience, and the other is based on sporting events and marketing hype. Many of the folks who believe in the superiority of BJJ do not even train in it, or any other art.
Those who argue that Classical Arts ARE reliably effective have decades of training and experience. I have listed my own experiences here many times and am a testimony to the effectiveness of my arts and the training I received. I am not boasting about myself but about the effectiveness of the training and knowledge I was handed by my Teachers.
If anyone else can dispute any side, please do! Bring your knowledge base and lets compare. There is a middle ground for sure. But one side is determined to stress their superiority.
I for one do not say that my a
(My comments are being cut off when I click on submit, so I had to copy and paste ---)
I for one do not say that my arts are better. I just want for the other side to admit that their arts come from Classical MA. I want them to see that there are TWO worlds of what is known or misnamed TMA. One where people like Tiger Schulmann exists, and the other where People like Taika Seiyu Oyata, Tetsuhiro Hokama, the Higa Family, Kishaba Brothers, Shinjo Brothers exist. And that they are TWO VERY DISTINCT worlds.
You cannot measure all martial arts with the same method of measurement. The same ruler cannot measure all things.
Do we measure distance, weight, pressure, and time with one instrument?
So we cannot measure empty martial arts with Classical Martial Arts.
Is there anyone in disagreement to this last statement?
If so - please elaborate.
Kratos - Great post! It reflects my sentiments exactly! As I stated, I am not here to define it, just to draw from different perspectives. Thank you for your participation. I don't expect to change the minds of anyone, but if I can help make things regarding my art clearer, and can help one young person gain insight into the world of real martial arts, I have accomplished something.
With that in mind, I want to give honorable mention to "Always a white belt" and "Drunior" for demonstrating great insight. It gives me hope that this new generation is here.
@murderous mma - As I stated, the techniques in mma are from the Classical Martial Arts. So if you would have sought out the right people, you would have learned SOOOOO much more about your art then - kick, punch, sweep, block. Your loss.
Great answers by both sides, or should I say ALL sides.
I hope there is a good amount of info here to help anyone with whatever their art of choice is.
I hope everyone answered according to their experience and not in the spirit of the industry's influence.
I'm going to put this to vote.
Thanks to all who participated.
23 Answers
- The CollectorLv 59 years agoFavorite Answer
I don't get too hung up on terminology, but "Grappling" to me is fighting without striking. You don't have to be on the ground but that's typically where grappling happens. Locks, arm bars, wrestling and things like that is all grappling in my book. With that being said, who cares what the technical definition is? I trained in Shotokan for a number of years and I've seen classes get held up, not because of incorrect technique but because of incorrect terminology, that's one of the numerous reasons I quit TMA and went to modern styles. I don't care about nomenclature, I care about technique and effectiveness.
Source(s): PLC - possumLv 79 years ago
Grappling means to grab: it's the opposite of throwing/evasion. It can involve chokes and locks, but does not specifically include throws or strikes. Grappling can be an intermediate means to a throw or a strike, just as strikes can be blocks and blocks can be strikes. But strictly speaking, grappling means ONLY to grab.
And it's not limited to ground fighting: you can employ a grab, choke, or lock while standing; you can strike, block, and evade whilst on the ground. Groundfighting has nothing to do with grappling, it's all about what you're doing while on the ground. This seems to be a pervasive myth around here: people assume groundfighting=grappling or that standing=striking. No. And No. Groundfighting means that: fighting while on the ground. Period.
In fighting, there are a limited number of technique styles you can employ:
You can strike, block, grab, or evade. That's it. Anything you do can fall into any of these categories, even overlap a few. Each can be the primary technique, the sole technique, a support technique, or a transitionary technique.
And throws? They're forms of evade, with strike, block, or grab as a support. Unless you're in WWE, you're not going to just pick up your opponent and toss him. Rather, you'll use his own momentum by getting off the line of attack (evade) and redirect him somewhere else using a strike and/or a block. Even when in a clinch - no momentum - you look for a balance point to break, taking your opponent to that break in balance. This is easily broken down into a grab and evade, nothing more.
EDIT for spelling
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- jwbulldogsLv 79 years ago
Grappling is close quarter contact. It can include many things. it can be done standing, kneeling, and on the ground. Traps, joint locks, small joint manipulations, throws, pins, clinches, and even chokes are all parts of grappling.
It can also be done with weapons. I won't list them all. We don;t have that much time. Plus I don't know them all.
The bo, jo kali, nunchaku all have grappling techniques taught in them. I was even amazed when I found out the the a shomenuchi sword cut was also a throw.
Too many beginners, wanna be, and fan boys think grappling is lying on the ground and fighting. The root word in grappling is grapple. Which means to seize, grasp, grab, or hold.
Source(s): Martial Arts since 1982 Black Belt in Shorin Ryu Black Belt in Jujitsu Brown Belt in Judo - YmirLv 69 years ago
Any offense/defense moves used between half the distance of my arm to my chest (to the foe), is grappling.
This includes wrestling, clinch work done in BJJ, Judo, Pankration, of course, but that's extremely close contact.
There are some very close range strikes that can be used even at that distance, but they're not grappling moves. Just exceptions. I don't use the term grappling. I use the 3 field distinctions of striking, joint locks, and throwing. That's because using one word to apply to a lot of things, tends to confuse people. Confused people are annoying.
JW makes a good point about weapons, when they become added as another joint in your body. Then it's half the distance of your arm plus the extra joint, and allows you to broaden the range for grappling moves. It also extends the range at which the enemy can use grappling moves, since they can always try to disarm you or grab your stick. That's why a sword was so good, it prevented people from just grasping it. A blade is always nice, even if it's just a dagger, for people who like to grapple.
- ?Lv 59 years ago
I remember someone once saying "There's no grappling in Judo" on this site. It felt like your intention in asking this question was to prove how the current generation that was fed a lot of Gracie family propaganda will describe "grappling". I agree that the current generation is misinformed and thinks that grappling is exclusive term for ground fighting.
Grappling to me always just meant the group of martial arts techniques that did not rely primarily on strikes, and instead focused on controlling the opponents movements through holds. It's fairly difficult to describe it, now that I tried.
Edit:
corrected a sentence by adding a missing word
- Bunshichi TanbaLv 49 years ago
you're the one who's invested all these years in training and research right? so what does everybody else here have to do ,
you can't just make them stop and think they have to do it themselves,there is no single way to define grappling anyway, that's like asking what is fighting? it's to deep and personal a question that takes decades of training and experience to even begin to scratch the surface of like you have
I could say something uneducated like listing a number of grappling based sports , but to be honest there is no way to have a complete perspective of grappling without putting in the years of training and research needed by looking at every art form you can,
if you talked to me 3 years ago I would have thought you were crazy telling me there is grappling in Karate or most forms of Kung Fu, but after looking more in depth I can see how ignorant I really was
You can post this question in an attempt to dispel ignorance and expect the younger generation to become better educated competent martial artists but in the end it is down to the individual to accomplish this , there are some highly educated answers here posted by people who no doubt have much more experience and training than I do ,but I still know that none of us here is ever gonna be close to getting it right because everyone here has a different perspective on the subject and though there is probably a finite number of techniques and positions in grappling due to the limitations of the human body no single person here will ever know them all, they will amass quite a knowledge of grappling but never a complete one the same is true of fighting in general, so ther is no clear cut way to define it
Source(s): Not looking for a debate just posting my thoughts on the subject No they aren't deep thoughts but I just couldn't sleep right if I didn't make an attempt to answer this - pugpaws2Lv 79 years ago
Good question. It has long been obvious to me that there are many here that have very different ideas about what is and what is not grappling. As I understand things, my definition of grappling includes anything that involves restricting the attackers movement or controls his body, balance, ...etc. So any joint locks throws or restraining techniques of any kind would be grappling. A bear hug, ....etc. In other words striking, kicking, sweeping would not be grappling. But any manipulation of the other persons body by using your hands, arms, or body to clench or restrain would be grappling. Included would be any pressure point manipulations of pressing or grabbing (Tuite-Jitsu).
It is as simple as that....
...
Source(s): Martial arts training and research over 44 years, (Since 1967) Teaching martial arts over 38 years, (Since 1973) - ?Lv 59 years ago
do you want the english definition or the roughly translated from asian languages definition?
not everything translates exactly but some do and remember things change over time.
in old boxing circa 1700 a punch was exactly that a motion with the arm made in a punching motion like a leather punch or hole punch with any hand formation not just the traditional fist they used the extended knuckle, palm heel, finger tips etc. but as long as it is in a straight line like a hole punch it is a punch much like any move in karate that is a tsuki isn't really a punch but a thrusting strike.
hooks and uppercut like swinging blows but from other angles too were referred to as rounding blows or round arm blows and they had hammerfists, backfists & edge of hand chops done with what they called chopping blows as in chopping with a sword.
the similarities probably came from them both being derived from warrior methods and more specifically sword arts.
so how do you define a punch?
the way it was originally meant or the way it is now?
I define grappling in the traditional western way which is synonymous with grab/ing and grip/ing and any method where you can entangle any part of them with any part of you is grappling.
grappling and wrestling are two different things as well and originally meant struggle not just to grapple or grip/grab in the english definition.
I have no idea about the other cultures ideas or concepts but I do know a bit about western history specifically related to martial arts but someone said something about anything manipulating the body but again in the western definition that is controlling the body and can be done without an entanglement.
*edit*
good point about ground fighting but what about a grappling hook, it just hooks onto something to let you pull onto it just like an anchor albeit not under ground but it doesn't have anything to do with setting someone off balance and a big part of grappling is not allowing yourself yo be entangled or embraced or grasped or whatever you want to call it .
I guess technically grappling strictly in fighting terms could be defined as, the act of engulfing an object within the circumference of a part of your person that attaches you to them?
Source(s): martial arts training since 1997 - kajukatLv 59 years ago
Technically, what we do in Kajukenbo is not really grappling in the MMA sense. When I used to train at the MMA training center, we used to watch the BBJ guys at the other end of the gym doing their stuff on the mat, that I would consider to be grappling. I am not that what the BBJ people do is easy, obviously, it is not, it's just different from what Kajukenbo people do.
In Kajukenbo, when we do a judo throw, we punch and kick the training partner a few times before the throw is done. It is to cut down on the resistance. We are not going for a struggle, we are trying to bring the opponent down to the sidewalk so that we can kick him some more. We are used to being punched and kicked hard, it is assumed that the average opponent on the street is not.
The same principle applies to the wrist locks, arm locks and leg locks we apply. We punch and kick the opponent a few times before the lock is applied. We are not trying to submit the opponent, we are trying to disable the opponent's limb so that he cannot pull out a weapon against us. For training purposes, we do not apply the lock with full force, and we let go of the pressure when the training partner taps, we do not let go of the training partner, we continue to punch and kick the training partner after he taps. While we are not trying to submit our training partner, the locks are done with violent force, which results in excruciating pain for the receiving partner, and after you tap, you will still be punched and kicked.
So, I do not consider what we do in Kajukenbo to be grappling, like in a contest to see who can outmaneuver one another. It is street fighting training, but street fighting that includes Judo throws, and Hawaiian Jujitsu wrist locks, arm locks and leg locks.
Source(s): Arnis, Muay Thai, Kajukenbo