Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is it lawful for an industry to be monopolized/controlled to a point where it prevents potential competition?
from being able to start up business?
ie - a municipal government issuing taxi licenses. if the industry is monopolized by pre-existing taxi companies, so as to dis-allow others from obtaining licenses unless they buy them from an existing owner and are sold at extraordinary/extortion amounts, instead of being returned to the municipality. Also, the committee which decides how many licenses to distribute is made up of those who have prime interest in the industry (ie - taxi company owners ONLY) - doesn't that seem a little bit unfair?
How does the Competition Act apply in such a situation?
What's there to protect the little guy who is interested in getting into the industry, but can't because he can't purchase a license?
Shouldn't people be required to return unused licenses to the municipality, instead of holding onto them and selling them privately?
4 Answers
- Anonymous9 years agoFavorite Answer
When the government does it, it's called a franchise.
- Yahoo JediLv 69 years ago
Monopoly is somewhat different from government controlled industry. For instance, government controlled industry are still answerable to the people (ie, if the public doesn't like it, they can vote out the committee reps, etc). There is no such mechanism for a monopoly, which is why its illegal. Also the GCI's are supposed to be transparent and their documentation, policies, procedures are open to the public (ie committee meetings and open houses to answer questions and issues from the public). Not so for monopolies.
Yes, the taxi industry seems monopolistic and unfair, but its a lot more open and fair than a monopoly -- which has no intention of letting you know why you were denied a medallion or how to get one. For instance, let's say NY, the department of taxis would come out with their survey and studies of what the volume of customers is, and the demand, and how much supply is needed to get to such and such a national average price, and then figure out how many taxis are needed, and then issue exactly that number of medallions.
In a monopoly, there is only one company offering taxi service, and they could put one cab on the streets or flood it so that prices are cheap. It is privately held and doesn't answer to anyone.
Oh and yes, because the medallions are issued, people hold onto them or resell them for profit. Pretty whacked but that's a whole another conversation.
- 9 years ago
Depends on the country.
In most of the world, yeah it is. We've actually almost achieved what you described, and once we're done, me and my Wall Street boys will tear up the foundations of society.