Want to answer atheists?

Well, without you stating any proof that "God" exist, therefore you can't state there is a "God".

as for "What if I said the sky was red and someone said no it's not so I ask them why isn't it red and they say because it's green? If I don't get the burden of proof you better have a damn good reason that is credible"

I can give you proof that the sky can be red and why can be green, or blue, the short answer is refraction. And I can show refraction in many way, show you why it happens.

So post or shut up.

The thing is, the big bang theory it just that. A theory. No one can prove that the big bang theory EVER happened. But it is the same way with God. It has not be proved. And honestly, it is a belief and an opinionated situation. Not a debate. A debate is whether we should pass a certain law or debate how a car should be designed.

There is no point in arguing over who is right and who is wrong. Everyone has a belief system. Some people believe in god. Other believe in big foot. Some believe in different diets. But just because your best friend isn't following you diet does not mean you should be angry about it. Because in the end either you will be fat and your friend skinny or the reverse. In the case with God, either you will go to heaven or you wont and vise versa with an atheist or a different religion that doesn't follow your god.

It is not up to you to decide who is right and who is wrong. I have my beliefs and you have yours. Why get angry over something you cannot control. None of us, in the whole world, has proof that they can display. Just be happy with your belief and don't try to force others to side with you because it will only make people dislike you and avoid you. Best thing for you to do (if this topic upsets you) is to avoid the conversation at all times. That way, you wont know if they have faith or not in god and that way, it wont upset you.

The Big Bang and evolution have absolutely nothing to do with the existence of gods. They are science and are supported by a great deal of evidence. Gods are beliefs and are supported by no evidence.

I do not believe in gods, therefore I am an atheist. It is that simple. My atheism says nothing about my acceptance or rejection of science or anything else for that matter. It is purely a stand on the belief of the existence of gods. I do not have to prove that gods do not exist, I make no claims about them. It is up to those who claim gods exist to provide some evidence, there is no requirement for me to provide any.

You only talk about one god. Do you not believe in the thousands of others? What proof do you have that Ganesh, Poseidon, Ra or Baal do not exist? If you don't need to prove they do not exist, I do not need to prove your god doesn't exist.

If you have proof for the existence of gods then you have achieved something no-one else has ever done. We would like to hear it.

If the only reason to believe that an entity exists and possesses certain attributes is because a story tells you it does, then how does disproving the story NOT demonstrate that belief in the entity is unsupportable?

While it's true that such an entity *could* exist despite a complete lack of evidence, and despite ample evidence to the contrary, it's also true that believing in the entity in such circumstances is unjustified.

As to whether or not any atheist will "debate you - you've given nothing to debate. Claiming that we are ignoring evidence that you refuse to provide is nothing more than childish whining. The rest of what you wrote is just incoherent rambling.

>They have no proof whatsoever that God doesn't exist

That's because the idea of God is an unfalsifiable claim. You can't disprove it. It's up to theists to prove that he exists. That's the burden of proof.

>I see that atheists think if the bible is wrong God must not exist

If you think the Bible is the 100% true word of God, then I can easily disprove the God of the Bible, yes.

Okay fair enough. Let's just compromise and say that IF some "god" exists, he/she/it:

1. Does not interfere in the affairs of mankind

2. Is nothing like the phony gods created in the world's holy books.

You are incoherent. This could be your problem when you argue and why you don't make a good point.

From what I'm getting, you are upset that your Bible beliefs are not accepted by everyone as true.

There are many very educated people-- historians, language specialists, sociologists, scientists, etc.-- with Ph.D's, who have read and studied and know the Bible inside-out way more than you do and they don't believe your God exists either.

Not everyone believes in your God or your Bible... even intelligent people who have read it.

You need to get over it.

You want reasons why the Biblical God, Yahweh, does not exist? Fine.

1) Omniscience is an impossible attribute to have, but Christians claim God is all knowing.

2) Omnipotence is an impossible attribute to have, but Christians claim God is all powerful.

3) Christians claim God answers prayer, but every study done to test the effectiveness of prayer shows no greater correlation than chance.

4) Omnipresence is incompatible with the idea that Hell is a state of separation from God, but Christians claim God is everywhere and that Hell exists.

5) It is claimed that God is in charge of all events in the universe, yet there is no room or need for "God" in any of the equations that describe motion, probability, statistics, physics, chemistry or biological occurrence. God does not participate, in any way, in the universe, but Christians claim he does.

All of these reasons show that the Christian version of god does not exist.

Yes, some versions of god are only rationally reduced to "not important" due to the lack of evidence supporting them. The Christian god is worse off since there is direct evidence showing that it does not exist.

I have every confidence that your "arguments" are nothing but tired apologetics that are easily debunked, but feel free to share them anyway. I enjoy a good chance to debunk religious nonsense.

I don't know if any deity exists, so I am agnostic ("without knowledge"). I also don't have any belief in the existence of a deity, so I am an atheist ("without gods"). Notice one does not have to say, "there is no god" to be an atheist. An atheist simply doesn't have a belief in gods.

As for "why" things happened as they happened... why does there have to be a "why"? Why not just a "how"? Cause and effect does not require a sentient being's conscious design.

If you have any evidence of the existence of god(s), you should share that. Your feelings, however, cannot be considered evidence.

~Agnostic atheist; ex-Christian

"... why is life possible under the right conditions? Why would a universe produce life? I think the universe wants us here...

What I got from your argument is that God is a metaphor for the universe... which has been scientifically explored. You have just aligned yourself with evolution, not creationism.