?

Psychiatric drugs actually change the natural chemical composition of ones brain. That is, by definition, brain damage.

Also, same can be said for labotomies or any physical surgery on the brain for the purposes of psychiatry.

I've been studying a lot of law and realized that people detained in psychiatric hospitals arent gauranteed civil rights.

For example, they are not allowed to see the evidence against them or are allowed to contest forced treatment upon them by a independent arbitrator (like a court of law which also includes come standard of solid evidence to make a conclusive diagnosis)

Such a thought is rather disturbing considering forced treatment can cause serious damage to ones harmony as well as possible brain/bodily damage that cannot be reversed.

So how is it possible that laws personified to psychiatric care circumvent civil rights??

I know civil rights are subjected to limitations, but there's suppose to be a balance rights of the individual and the rights of the a State ( society as a whole), the same way the criminal justice system strikes a balance towards the rights of an accused individual and the state.

For example, if they think a patient in a psychiatric unit is dangerous because they walked to fast towards them and were emotional but never made any obvious threatening gestures, could mental health staff be sued for jumping the gun.

Could it be considered unlawful confinement?? The same way a cop who arrests someone without probable grounds could be criminally charged for holding someone against their will as of a stranger had done the same thing.

....as opposed to depressed/suicidal people who feel suicidal due to chemical imbalances in their brain.

To me, it just seems wrong labelling someone as "mentally ill" because they are overwhelmed with unbearable stress from real life-damaging problems as opposed to those who are suicidal because of an actual disorder in their brain/mind.

I'm pretty sure its not real leather either

I'm going to be applying for a working holiday visa for Australia soon and I was just wondering if there was some type of physical certificate you receive in the mail if you are approved.

I know EI contributions are tax deductible since a portion of your earned income goes in to the EI fund, thereby reducing your take-home pay. However, you pay income tax on any EI benefits you collect, just as you would pay income tax off your pay cheque from work.

Also, since EI is separate from your taxes and has its own fund paid for by employees & employers additionally to taxes and other government contributions (like Canada Pension Plan), your tax dollars aren't paying back the EI fund in any way.

So unless there's something I'm missing, I don't understand why your taxes go up either the year you collected EI or the year after, on your next tax return??

I know EI contributions are tax deductible since a portion of your earned income goes in to the EI fund, thereby reducing your take-home pay. However, you pay income tax on any EI benefits you collect, just as you would pay income tax off your pay cheque from work.

Also, since EI is separate from your taxes and has its own fund paid for by employees & employers additionally to taxes and other government contributions (like Canada Pension Plan), your tax dollars aren't paying back the EI fund in any way.

So unless there's something I'm missing, I don't understand why your taxes go up either the year you collected EI or the year after, on your next tax return??

My job allows me to claim travel expenses on my income tax as a deductible since its a long commute to work. I can claim the cost of my daily ferry ticket to work (my place of work is on an island) as well as other travel costs.

So if I add up all my travel expenses to and from work, is the total amount multiplied by my Tax rate from whichever tax bracket I fall in to at the end of the year and then subtract that amount from my income? Is that how it works?

Can someone be denied bail for that reason alone??

Also, can people be denied bail if there's concern that two or more people may try to come up with a story that's not true to avoid being charged??

My Dad was a policeman in the RCMP and he told me awhile ago that police are required by law to destroy someone's fingerprints if they haven't been convicted of an offence. (ie: charges were stayed, withdrawn, or an acquittal) and they don't have any other convictions on file.

However, now police are allowed to retain your fingerprints. They can only be destroyed if you request that they be destroyed and its up to the discretion of the police to do so or not.

- Tax Exemptions

- Employment programs intended only for aboriginals.

- Special funding for aboriginal causes

- leniency in sentencing for those convicted of crimes ( like sentencing circles.

- The right to have their kids adopted only by aboriginal famines, if they put their kid(s) up for adoption.

And the list goes on.

So why should aboriginals be treated equally when they expect special treatment?

And are there crimes that automatically bar someone from being bonded? Or do insurance costs simply go up?

....Or does a defendant have to represent themselves??

I know legal aid is meant to provide a lawyer for those who can't afford one but to qualified for legal aid, you have to make under a certain amount of money. In my province, its $1,410/month. If you make over that you don't qualify for legal aid even if you really can't afford one.

It seems like Germany was wronged by being forces to sign the Treaty of Versailles for a couple reasons.

A) Germany wasn't the sole cause of the War, nor did they start the War. They simply supported their ally Austria-Hungary.

B) When they supported Austria-Hungary, their ally had a good reason to invade Serbia: To catch the Man responsible for the assassination of their Monarch after Serbia refused to hand him over and offered him protection. ( Just like the US invasion of Afghanistan over Osama Bin Laden)

When I set up my new iPod touch 5th generation, I set it up with iCloud, so all my apps from my previous iPod touch 4th generation went straight on my new iPod.

I had the original background that came on the iPod 4th generation of the ocean with the ripple affect of the waves ( which I liked) until I selected another background. Now I can't go back because the original background from iOS 6 isn't available on iOS 7.

And I don't want to download a picture from google images. If rather reset the background

Aside from the obvious health problems of second-hand smoke, isn't it irresponsible to smoke when you have kids because its money wasted that could if been spent on their needs & occasional wants??

Kinda selfish ain't it?